Home▸Digital Pathology & AI Slide Analysis▸Pathology Annotation Consensus & Inter-Rater Agreement (2D)

Pathology Annotation Consensus & Inter-Rater Agreement (2D)

2D canvas version: multiple simulated pathologists independently label the same whole-slide patches, drag-rotate a layered isometric stack of their calls, and watch Fleiss' kappa, consensus Dice score and unanimous-agreement rate respond live.

Digital Pathology & AI Slide Analysis2DAdvanced60 FPS📱 Mobile-adapted⇄ 3D version
2d-biology-ext-topic-17 ↗ Open standalone

Before any digital-pathology AI model can be trained, someone has to decide what "tumor" looks like on a slide — and different pathologists don't always agree. This 2D canvas simulator draws several independent raters' tumor calls over the same grid of whole-slide-image patches as a draggable, rotatable isometric stack of layers above the true tumor mask, then majority-votes them into a consensus ground truth shown in a separate live vote-fraction heatmap. Live readouts compute Fleiss' kappa across the raters, the Dice overlap between the consensus mask and the real truth, and the fraction of patches every rater agreed on — showing directly why noisy or biased annotation, not model architecture, is often the ceiling on a pathology AI pipeline's real-world accuracy.

⚙ Under the hood

2D canvas version: multiple simulated pathologists independently label the same whole-slide-image patches with tunable error rates and bias, majority-voted into a consensus ground truth; drag-rotate a layered isometric stack of their calls and watch a live vote-fraction heatmap, Fleiss' kappa, Dice overlap and unanimous-agreement readouts respond in real time.

digital pathologyinter-rater agreementFleiss kappaDice coefficientannotation consensusmedical AI

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)