Standards and Concepts
Several international standards govern the design, implementation, and verification of robotic systems intended for use in environments with human workers. ISO 10218 defines requirements for robots and their associated supporting equipment, while ISO 13849 focuses on safety-related parts of control systems for potentially dangerous machinery. Furthermore, ISO/TS 15066 provides technical specification guidance for collaborative robot applications, addressing specific hazards and risk mitigation strategies.
Architectures
Robotic systems designed to meet safety standards typically incorporate a layered architecture focused on redundancy and fail-safe mechanisms. This includes the use of safety PLCs – Programmable Logic Controllers – specifically configured for safety functions, alongside redundant sensing technologies like laser scanners and force sensors to ensure continued operation in case of component failure. Emergency stop circuits are crucial for immediate shutdown, coupled with power and torque limiting devices to prevent excessive forces during collisions.
Examples
Consider a cobot (collaborative robot) integrated into an assembly line scenario; this requires careful zone definition and speed management to ensure safe interaction with human operators. The system would integrate safety sensors, such as light curtains or force torque sensors, alongside a PLC programmed with safety logic. Validation of the system’s safety performance is achieved through rigorous force measurements and simulations, demonstrating adherence to defined risk levels.
Frequently asked questions
How to select sensors?
Selecting appropriate sensors for a safety-certified robotic system involves careful consideration of the specific hazards present in the application. Typically, certified LiDAR systems are used for obstacle detection and range measurement, while light curtains provide reliable zone monitoring and contact sensors offer localized hazard detection – all must meet relevant ISO standards.
How to validate?
Validation of a safety-certified robotic system relies on a combination of rigorous testing procedures and independent verification. This includes comprehensive safety audits performed by qualified personnel, alongside documentation of test results and adherence to established validation protocols defined within the chosen ISO standard.
Collaborative modes?
Collaborative robot operation utilizes specific modes designed to manage interaction between robots and humans. These include speed/separation monitoring, where the robot’s movements are limited based on its distance from a human worker, coupled with power/force limiting to restrict the maximum forces exerted during contact or potential collisions – all facilitated by hand guiding for operator control.
Documentation?
Maintaining thorough documentation is paramount throughout the entire lifecycle of a safety-certified robotic system. This includes detailed risk assessments outlining identified hazards and mitigation strategies, alongside comprehensive records of test results, validation activities, and any modifications made to the system’s design or configuration.
Retrofitting?
Retrofitting an existing robotic system with safety features involves adding dedicated safety controllers and implementing appropriate guarding measures. This typically includes installing emergency stop buttons, light curtains, or other sensors to create a safe operating envelope around the robot, ensuring compliance with relevant safety standards.
Human factors?
Effective human-robot interaction necessitates careful consideration of ergonomics and clear signaling protocols. This includes designing intuitive interfaces for operator control, providing adequate space for safe movement around the robot, and utilizing visual or auditory cues to alert operators to potential hazards.
Testing?
Regular functional tests are essential for verifying the continued operation of a safety-certified robotic system. Furthermore, fault injection testing – simulating component failures – helps identify vulnerabilities and ensures that fail-safe mechanisms function correctly under abnormal conditions.
Certification path?
Obtaining certification for a safety-certified robotic system requires engagement with a recognized notified body early in the design process. These bodies conduct independent assessments to verify compliance with relevant ISO standards and issue certificates confirming that the robot meets specified safety requirements.
Software safety?
Ensuring software safety within a collaborative robotic system is critical, demanding deterministic behavior in control algorithms and verified components through rigorous testing and analysis. This approach minimizes the risk of unexpected or erroneous actions that could compromise safety performance.
Common pitfalls?
Common pitfalls in the design and implementation of safety-certified robotic systems include incomplete risk coverage – failing to identify all potential hazards – and inadequate maintenance practices, which can lead to degradation of sensors or control components and ultimately compromise system safety.
Try it live
Everything above runs in your browser — open Inverse Kinematics (FABRIK) and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.
▶ Open Inverse Kinematics (FABRIK) simulation