Laser vs RF Downlink — Pointing Precision Tradeoff
Compare an optical laser downlink against a traditional RF downlink: the laser's razor-thin beam delivers vastly higher data rates but drops the link the instant pointing jitter pushes it off target, while RF's wide forgiving cone stays locked at a fraction of the throughput.
A satellite beams data to a ground station using two coexisting downlinks: a traditional RF antenna and an optical laser terminal. Both share the same simulated pointing jitter and atmospheric turbulence. The RF beam is wide and forgiving — it stays locked across almost any jitter level, but its data rate is modest and roughly constant. The laser beam is razor-thin and can carry dramatically more data when perfectly aligned, but the same jitter that RF ignores walks it off the receiver, dropping the link to zero until it reacquires — unless active fine-pointing correction is engaged to track out the error. Toggle fine-pointing and drag the jitter slider to see the throughput-versus-robustness tradeoff play out live on the chart.
A satellite beams data to a ground station over two coexisting downlinks. The wide RF beam stays locked through almost any pointing jitter at a modest, steady data rate; the razor-thin laser beam can carry dozens of times more data when aligned, but the same jitter walks it off the receiver and drops the link to zero until active fine-pointing corrects it. Compare both live on a shared throughput chart.
3D · Three.js / WebGL renderer · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install