HomeCybersecurityAd Microtargeting: Precision Propaganda vs Broadcast Reach

Ad Microtargeting: Precision Propaganda vs Broadcast Reach

Interactive 3D opinion-dynamics simulator: watch a targeted ad campaign concentrate persuasion on a susceptible audience segment versus broadcasting the same budget uniformly, then dial in ad-library disclosure to see how transparency blunts microtargeting.

Cybersecurity3DModerate60 FPS
cyber-propaganda ↗ Open standalone

This simulator visualizes the mechanic behind coordinated influence campaigns that platforms and regulators try to detect: audience microtargeting. A population of 1,600 simulated people is laid out across two psychographic axes — political lean and media trust — each with a fixed susceptibility to persuasion. Launching a campaign pulse spends a fixed ad budget either broadcast uniformly across everyone or concentrated with a targeting kernel on the most persuadable cluster; the terrain rises and reddens wherever belief has shifted toward the campaign's message. Live readouts track average belief shift, targeting ROI (persuasion per unit of spend), audience reach and population polarization, and an ad-library disclosure toggle shows how platform transparency rules blunt the efficiency advantage that precision targeting has over honest broadcast messaging — the same defensive mechanism real ad-transparency mandates use against propaganda operations.

⚙ Under the hood

Launch an ad campaign at a simulated population laid out on political-lean and media-trust axes, comparing how much belief shift the same budget buys when broadcast uniformly versus concentrated on a susceptible audience segment, then see how ad-library disclosure blunts targeting's efficiency edge.

propagandamicrotargetingcybersecurityopinion dynamicsad transparencyinfluence operations

3D · Three.js / WebGL renderer · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)