Catalytic Turnover: Atom Economy Race
Compare a catalytic cycle against a stoichiometric reagent side by side: watch the catalyst turn over indefinitely while a stoichiometric activator is consumed once per product, and see turnover number, atom economy and E-factor update live.
Two identical reactions run side by side, differing only in how the promoting reagent is supplied. In the top lane, a fixed handful of catalyst molecules sit at the reaction zone, converting a steady stream of substrate into product and cycling back to their original state every time — never consumed, turning over indefinitely, with the running total tracked as the turnover number (TON). In the bottom lane, an equivalent-for-equivalent stoichiometric activator is spent once per product molecule and reports straight to the waste bin alongside the reaction's intrinsic leaving group. Live readouts compute atom economy from the balanced equation and E-factor (waste mass per product mass) for each route from real molar-mass arithmetic, letting you see exactly why catalytic processes generate far less waste than stoichiometric ones even when the core chemistry — and its atom economy — is identical.
Watch a catalytic cycle and a stoichiometric reagent run the same reaction side by side: the catalyst turns over and is reused indefinitely while the stoichiometric activator is consumed once per product molecule, with turnover number, atom economy and E-factor computed live from real molar-mass arithmetic.
3D · Three.js / WebGL renderer · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install