🧠 Bipolar Depression Treatment Simulator
This model selects treatment for bipolar depression (quetiapine, lurasidone, lamotrigine) and demonstrates the risk of affective switch during monotherapy with antidepressants without a mood stabilizer.
Bipolar Depression Presentation
Patient presents in a depressive episode within bipolar disorder.
- Depressive: Episode Polarity (placeholder metric)
- ≥1: Prior Manic Episodes (placeholder metric)
- ~40%: Misdiagnosis Rate (placeholder metric)
- MDQ: Screening Tool (placeholder metric)
Clinical picture
Low mood, anergia and anhedonia dominate the presentation.
Diagnostic caution
Ruling out unipolar depression guides safer drug choice.
Placeholder: unrecognized bipolarity raises switch risk later.
Baseline severity
Severity score anchors the mood dial before treatment.
Quetiapine / Lurasidone / Lamotrigine
Approved agents move mood toward euthymia without antidepressant risk.
- 300 mg: Quetiapine XR (placeholder dose)
- 20–120 mg: Lurasidone (placeholder dose)
- 200 mg: Lamotrigine (placeholder target)
- Low: Switch Risk (placeholder metric)
Mechanism
Each agent stabilizes mood via distinct receptor pathways.
Titration
Slow titration limits sedation and metabolic side effects.
Placeholder: these agents carry no antidepressant-induced switch signal.
Response timeline
Improvement builds gradually over several weeks.
Antidepressant Monotherapy Risk
An antidepressant given alone can destabilize bipolar mood.
- High: Switch Risk (AD alone) (placeholder metric)
- No: Stabilizer Present (placeholder flag)
- Class-wide: Guideline Warning (placeholder metric)
- Weeks 2–6: Onset of Risk (placeholder window)
Why monotherapy is risky
Unopposed antidepressant activity can push mood upward sharply.
Guideline stance
Major guidelines advise against AD monotherapy in bipolar disorder.
Placeholder: risk climbs the longer monotherapy continues.
Warning signs
Irritability and racing thoughts may signal early switch.
Switch-to-Mania Risk Visualization
The dial crosses euthymia and spikes into the manic zone.
- >80%: Peak Switch Risk (placeholder metric)
- Manic pole: Mood Overshoot (placeholder metric)
- Partial: Reversibility (placeholder metric)
- Elevated: Hospitalization Risk (placeholder metric)
The switch mechanism
Antidepressant drive overshoots mood past the stable zone.
Clinical consequence
A manic switch can require urgent dose adjustment.
Placeholder: switch risk scales sharply with treatment weeks.
Recognizing it early
Rapid mood elevation flags a treatment-emergent switch.
Safe Combination Strategy
A mood stabilizer shields against antidepressant-driven switch.
- AD + Stabilizer: Combination Approach (placeholder metric)
- Reduced: Switch Risk (combo) (placeholder metric)
- Quetiapine/Lamotrigine: Preferred Base Agents (placeholder metric)
- Weekly: Monitoring Interval (placeholder metric)
Combination rationale
Stabilizer coverage offsets antidepressant destabilization.
Practical protocol
Stabilizer is established before any antidepressant is added.
Placeholder: combination therapy keeps the dial near euthymia.
Long-term outlook
Maintenance therapy sustains mood stability over time.
This model selects treatment for bipolar depression (quetiapine, lurasidone, lamotrigine) and demonstrates the risk of affective switch during monotherapy with antidepressants without a mood stabilizer.
2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install