HomeArticlesSphere Projections

Map Projections: Six Ways to Flatten a Sphere, and What Each One Sacrifices

Why Greenland looks huge on your classroom map, and how Mercator, Mollweide, stereographic and gnomonic projections each trade one distortion for another.

mysimulator teamUpdated June 2026≈ 7 min read▶ Open the simulation

The problem no flat map can escape

A sphere's surface cannot be flattened onto a plane without distorting something — this is a rigorous result, not an engineering limitation, following from Gauss's Theorema Egregium (1827): a sphere has constant positive curvature, a flat plane has zero curvature, and curvature is an intrinsic property that no stretching or bending (without tearing) can change. Every map projection is therefore a deliberate trade-off about which property to preserve — area, angle, distance or direction — because no projection can preserve all of them simultaneously.

live demo · six projections of the same globe, side by side● LIVE

Mercator: angles survive, area does not

Gerardus Mercator's 1569 projection is conformal — it preserves angles and local shapes exactly, which makes it invaluable for navigation, since a straight line drawn on a Mercator map is a rhumb line: a path of constant compass bearing, letting sailors steer a fixed heading for the whole voyage. The cost is area distortion that grows without bound toward the poles: Greenland, roughly the size of Algeria in reality (about 2.2 million km² versus 2.4 million km²), appears comparable to Africa (30 million km²) on a standard Mercator map. Antarctica, similarly, is stretched into a band across the entire bottom of the map.

Equal-area projections: shape bends so area survives

Mollweide and other equal-area projections take the opposite trade: every region's area on the map is proportional to its true area on the globe, at the cost of visibly distorting shapes and angles, especially near the map's edges. This makes equal-area projections the right choice whenever a map is meant to convey quantity across regions — population density, land use, resource distribution — where a Mercator map's inflated high-latitude regions would visually mislead the reader about relative scale.

Stereographic and orthographic: projecting from a point

Both of these can be constructed with a simple geometric picture: imagine a light source somewhere along the sphere's axis, casting the surface's shadow onto a flat plane. Stereographic projection places the light at the point directly opposite the tangent plane and is conformal — it preserves angles exactly, and remarkably maps every circle on the sphere to either a circle or a straight line on the plane, a property exploited in complex analysis and crystallography. Orthographic projection instead uses parallel rays from infinitely far away, producing the familiar 'photograph of a globe from space' look — realistic near the centre, but compressing regions near the visible edge into a sliver, since the sphere curves away from the viewer fastest there.

stereographic:   light source at the antipodal point  →  conformal, circles stay circles
orthographic:    light source at infinity                →  looks like a photo, edges compressed
azimuthal equidistant: distances from the center are exact →  used in the UN emblem
gnomonic:        light source at the sphere's center      →  every great circle becomes a straight line

The gnomonic projection's straight-great-circle property is exactly why it matters for flight planning: the shortest path between two points on a sphere (the great-circle route) is a curved line on a Mercator map but a dead-straight line on a gnomonic one, which is why long-haul flight paths look so counter-intuitively curved when drawn on the ordinary world map most people are used to.

Choosing a projection is choosing what to lie about

Cartographers sometimes summarise this with a blunt truth: every flat map lies, and the only choice is which lie you can live with. Navigation wants conformal (Mercator, stereographic); statistics and demography want equal-area (Mollweide); distance-from-a-single-point diagrams want azimuthal equidistant; and flight planning wants gnomonic. There is no projection that a cartographer would call 'best' in general — only best for a specific task, and picking the wrong one for the job is how Mercator's navigational tool ended up, controversially, as the default classroom picture of the world for a century, quietly inflating the visual importance of high-latitude countries.

Frequently asked questions

Why can't any map projection be perfect?

Because a sphere and a plane have different intrinsic curvature, a mathematical fact captured by Gauss's Theorema Egregium: no smooth transformation between them can preserve area, angle and distance all at once. Every projection has to sacrifice at least one of those properties.

Why does Greenland look so huge on most world maps?

Most classroom wall maps use the Mercator projection, which preserves angles for navigation but stretches areas increasingly toward the poles. Greenland, which sits at a high latitude, ends up displayed at roughly the visual size of Africa even though Africa's true area is about fourteen times larger.

Which projection should you use to measure the shortest flight path?

The gnomonic projection, because it is the only common projection where every great-circle route — the true shortest path between two points on a sphere — is drawn as a straight line. On a Mercator map the same shortest path appears as a curve.

Try it live

Everything above runs in your browser — open Sphere Projections and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.

▶ Open Sphere Projections simulation

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)