Life Support Architecture Comparison: Resupply Mass…

Open-Loop Expendable Life Support

In an open-loop expendable system, all consumables are continuously supplied from Earth. This approach is simple but resource-intensive, as it relies on regular resupply missions to replenish oxygen, water, food, and other essentials.

Despite its simplicity, this method ensures a reliable supply chain and can be quickly adapted for different mission requirements without needing complex onboard systems.

ISS-Style Partial Closure

The ISS-style partial closure system aims to reduce the reliance on resupply missions by recycling air, water, and waste. It captures carbon dioxide from exhaled breath and converts it back into oxygen using a process called Sabatier reaction. Water is recovered from urine, sweat, and condensation through distillation.

While this approach saves mass compared to open-loop systems, it still requires some resupply missions for critical items that cannot be regenerated on board.

live demo · related simulation● LIVE

Full Bioregenerative Closure

A full bioregenerative closure system integrates plants and microorganisms into the life-support architecture to provide food, oxygen, and water. This approach mimics Earth’s natural cycles more closely and can significantly reduce resupply needs.

However, it is complex and requires careful management of plant growth, nutrient cycling, and waste processing to ensure a stable and sustainable environment.

Trade-offs in Life Support Systems

Each life-support architecture has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Open-loop systems are straightforward but costly due to frequent resupply missions. Partial closure reduces this cost by recycling resources, though it still requires some resupply. Full bioregenerative systems offer the most sustainable solution but come with significant engineering challenges.

Choosing the right system depends on mission duration, crew size, and available technology.

Frequently asked questions

Why is resupply mass important for space missions?

Resupply mass directly impacts the overall cost and complexity of a mission. Reducing it can lower launch costs and improve mission sustainability by minimizing the need for frequent resupply trips.

Can all three life-support systems be used simultaneously in one mission?

While theoretically possible, integrating multiple life-support systems would complicate mission management and potentially increase risk. Typically, missions use a single system tailored to their specific needs.

What are the main challenges of implementing bioregenerative closure on long-duration missions?

Bioregenerative closure faces challenges such as plant growth variability, nutrient cycling efficiency, and waste management. Ensuring a stable and sustainable ecosystem requires precise control over environmental conditions.

How does the ISS's life support system compare to these architectures?

The ISS uses elements of both partial closure and bioregenerative systems. It recycles water, oxygen, and some waste but still relies on regular resupply missions for critical items not fully regenerable on board.

Try it live

Everything above runs in your browser — open Life Support Architecture Comparison: Resupply Mass Simulator and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.

▶ Open Life Support Architecture Comparison: Resupply Mass Simulator simulation