Home▸Articles▸Financial Models & Markets

Carbon Boundary & Emissions Ledger Simulator: Understanding Scope 1, 2, and 3 Emissions

A tool for understanding the complexities of carbon accounting in different organizational structures.

mysimulator teamUpdated June 2026≈ 4 min read▶ Open the simulation

What Carbon Boundaries Are

Carbon boundaries refer to the scope of a company's or organization’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These can be categorized into three scopes: Scope 1, which includes direct emissions from owned or controlled sources; Scope 2, which covers indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling; and Scope 3, which encompasses all other indirect emissions that occur in the value chain of the company but are not owned or directly controlled by it. The choice of boundary approach significantly influences the total carbon footprint reported.

The simulation allows users to toggle between these different scopes, providing a nuanced view of how each affects overall emissions reporting and management strategies.

Why Different Boundary Approaches Matter

Different boundary approaches can lead to vastly different perceptions of an organization's carbon footprint. For instance, focusing on Scope 1 and 2 might highlight immediate operational changes needed, while including Scope 3 could reveal the broader impact of supply chains and customer behaviors. This distinction is crucial for setting realistic decarbonization goals and understanding where efforts should be concentrated.

Moreover, regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations often differ based on which boundary approach is used, making it essential to choose wisely depending on the context.

live demo · related simulation● LIVE

Decarbonization Pathways

The simulation also allows users to explore decarbonization pathways by adjusting the ambition level between a 1.5°C and well-below-2°C target, which align with the Paris Agreement goals for limiting global warming. These pathways represent different levels of emission reductions over time, providing insights into the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of various strategies.

By dragging or scrubbing through the business-as-usual trend against these decarbonization trajectories, users can visualize potential outcomes and make informed decisions about their organizational boundaries.

Implications for Business Strategy

Understanding carbon boundaries is critical for developing effective climate strategies. Companies must consider the full scope of their emissions to ensure comprehensive action plans that align with both regulatory requirements and long-term sustainability goals.

The simulation helps users grasp these complexities, enabling them to make more informed decisions about organizational structure, operational control, and financial management in relation to carbon accounting.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between equity-share, operational-control, and financial-control boundaries?

Equity-share boundaries focus on emissions from assets that a company owns or controls through its shares. Operational-control boundaries include all emissions from activities directly managed by the organization, regardless of ownership. Financial-control boundaries are broader, encompassing any entity whose financial performance is regularly reviewed and reported to the parent company.

How does including Scope 3 emissions affect a company's carbon footprint?

Including Scope 3 emissions can significantly increase a company’s reported carbon footprint because it includes indirect emissions from suppliers, customers, and other parts of the value chain. This broader scope helps in identifying areas where the company has influence but less direct control over emissions.

Why is setting a decarbonization pathway important?

Setting a decarbonization pathway provides a clear roadmap for reducing carbon emissions, aligning with global climate goals. It helps organizations plan and prioritize actions, allocate resources effectively, and communicate their commitment to sustainability.

How does the choice of boundary approach impact regulatory compliance?

The choice of boundary approach can affect how an organization meets regulatory requirements and reporting standards. Different approaches may be mandated by specific regulations or preferred by stakeholders, so selecting the right boundary is crucial for ensuring compliance.

Try it live

Everything above runs in your browser — open Carbon Boundary & Emissions Ledger Simulator (2D) and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.

▶ Open Carbon Boundary & Emissions Ledger Simulator (2D) simulation

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)