Home▸Robotics & Kinematics▸Redundant Safety Channel vs Single-Channel Robot Control (2D)

Redundant Safety Channel vs Single-Channel Robot Control (2D)

Top-down 2D port: inject a runaway-command fault into an industrial robot arm's main controller. Compare a single-channel arm, which keeps moving until it collides, against a redundant safety-monitoring channel that watches actual motion independently and triggers an emergency stop before any collision.

Robotics & Kinematics2DModerate60 FPS📱 Mobile-adapted⇄ 3D version
2d-redundant-safety-channel-vs-single-channel-robot-control ↗ Open standalone

A safety-critical robot arm cannot rely on its main controller to catch its own failures. This top-down 2D simulator lets you inject a runaway-command fault — simulating a software crash, hang or bug — into the main controller of an arm working near a marked safety zone and a human figure, then compare two architectures: a single-channel arm with nothing watching the main controller, which keeps moving on the faulty command until it collides, against an arm with an independent redundant safety-monitoring channel that reads actual position and velocity straight from sensors and triggers a hardware emergency stop the instant motion leaves the safe envelope — well before any collision, regardless of what the main controller keeps trying to do.

⚙ Under the hood

Top-down 2D port: inject a runaway-command fault into a robot arm's main controller and compare a single-channel arm, which keeps moving until it collides, against a redundant safety-monitoring channel that trips an independent emergency stop before any collision.

RoboticsFunctional SafetyFault InjectionRedundancyControl Systems

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)