Home▸Quantum Physics▸GHZ vs W States (2D): Entanglement Robustness Under Particle Loss

GHZ vs W States (2D): Entanglement Robustness Under Particle Loss

A 2D ring-network view of GHZ vs W multipartite entanglement: watch pairwise concurrence between surviving qubits collapse instantly for a GHZ state after any particle loss, while a W state degrades gracefully as 2/N, with live concurrence readouts and the exact closed-form math.

Quantum Physics2DAdvanced60 FPS📱 Mobile-adapted⇄ 3D version
2d-qe-topic-84 ↗ Open standalone

Both the GHZ state and the W state are "maximally" multipartite entangled N-qubit states, but they sit in genuinely different SLOCC entanglement classes with opposite behaviour under loss: tracing out any subset of qubits from a GHZ state leaves the remaining pair with exactly zero pairwise concurrence for N ≥ 3, while the same operation on a W state leaves a robust concurrence of 2/N that shrinks gracefully rather than collapsing. This 2D ring-network view lets you pick GHZ or W, randomly "lose" qubits at a chosen probability the way a real photonic or trapped-ion link would drop particles, and watch the surviving entangled bonds redraw with brightness proportional to the real closed-form concurrence — with live numeric readouts for surviving qubit count, pairwise concurrence, and whether the full N-party coherence is still intact.

⚙ Under the hood

A 2D ring-network view of GHZ vs W multipartite entanglement: watch pairwise concurrence between surviving qubits collapse instantly for a GHZ state after any particle loss, while a W state degrades gracefully as 2/N.

quantum-entanglementghz-statew-stateconcurrencemultipartite-entanglementquantum-networks2d

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)