Home▸Orexin Antagonist Sleep Therapy▸Insomnia Severity Index Treatment Response Simulator

💊 Insomnia Severity Index Treatment Response Simulator

This simulation tracks the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in response to treatment with an orexin antagonist, providing insights into the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches for managing insomnia.

Orexin Antagonist Sleep Therapy2DModerate60 FPS
isi-treatment-response-simulator ↗ Open standalone

Baseline Insomnia Severity Index Score

Severe insomnia recorded before orexin antagonist therapy begins.

  • 0–28: ISI score range (clinician/self-rated scale)
  • ≥22: Severe cutoff (defines this baseline)
  • 7: Items assessed (sleep and daytime domains)
  • DORA: Drug class (dual orexin receptor antagonist)

Seven-item questionnaire

Items rate onset, maintenance, satisfaction, and daytime impact.

Severity threshold

A score of 22 or higher marks severe insomnia.

Why orexin antagonists

They block wake-promoting signaling instead of sedating broadly.

Early Improvement in Sleep Onset and Maintenance

First two weeks bring modest gains in falling and staying asleep.

  • ~-15%: Onset latency change (typical by week 2)
  • Fewer: Night awakenings (early orexin suppression effect)
  • ~17–19h: Lemborexant half-life (supports maintenance benefit)
  • Highest: Dropout risk (during weeks 1–2)

Onset and maintenance lead

Falling and staying asleep improve before daytime symptoms.

Adherence matters early

Missed doses blunt gains during this fragile window.

Side-effect monitoring

Next-day somnolence is checked closely at this stage.

Moderate Range Improvement by Treatment Week Four

Total score shifts from severe into the moderate insomnia band.

  • 15–21: Target ISI band (moderate insomnia range)
  • Week 4: Typical visit (first efficacy checkpoint)
  • ↑ steadily: Sleep efficiency (measured by actigraphy)
  • Additive: CBT-I combo effect (when paired with therapy)

Moderate range entry

Score typically crosses below 22 by this visit.

Daytime items lag

Interference and distress items improve more slowly.

Titration decisions

Dose or behavioral add-ons considered if response stalls.

Continued Improvement Toward the Subclinical Range

By week eight, scores approach the subthreshold insomnia band.

  • 8–14: Target ISI band (subthreshold insomnia range)
  • Sustained: Response trajectory (gains hold across weeks)
  • Notable: Functional gains (daytime interference eases)
  • Low: Tolerance risk (for DORA class at 8 weeks)

Nearing subthreshold

Most items fall below moderate severity by now.

Functioning recovers

Concentration and mood benefit from consolidated sleep.

Maintenance planning

Clinicians plan whether to continue or taper therapy.

Clinically Meaningful Treatment Response Achieved

A drop of seven or more points marks a genuine treatment response.

  • ≥7 pts: MCID threshold (minimal clinically important difference)
  • ≤7: Remission target (ISI score for full remission)
  • ~60–70%: Response rate (reported in DORA trials)
  • Ongoing: Relapse watch (periodic ISI re-scoring advised)

Defining response

A seven-point drop is considered clinically meaningful.

Remission goal

Scores at or below seven indicate full remission.

Long-term follow-up

Periodic rescoring guards against symptom relapse.

⚙ Under the hood

This simulation tracks the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in response to treatment with an orexin antagonist, providing insights into the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches for managing insomnia.

CanvasBiomedicine

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)