💓 White-Coat & Masked Hypertension Monitoring Simulator
A simulator that demonstrates the discrepancy between office and real-world blood pressure readings and its impact on diagnosis, showcasing ambulatory and home monitoring techniques.
Office Blood Pressure Measurement
One reading in a clinic chair, taken under stress and time pressure.
- 1.3 B: Global adults with HTN (estimated worldwide)
- 1: Office readings taken (single snapshot moment)
- +10-20: White-coat effect rise (mmHg typical bump)
- 130/80: Diagnostic threshold (mmHg office cutoff)
Why office readings vary
Anxiety, rushed timing, and cuff technique all skew a single clinic reading.
One snapshot rarely reflects a full day of pressure.
The white-coat effect
Clinical settings themselves can transiently raise blood pressure readings.
Limits of a single visit
One number cannot capture circadian and activity-driven BP variation.
Ambulatory & Home BP Monitoring
Repeated readings across a normal day capture the true pressure pattern.
- ~48-96: ABPM readings/day (every 15-30 min)
- ~12-14: HBPM readings/wk (AM and PM pairs)
- 135/85: Home threshold (mmHg cutoff)
- 10-20%: Nighttime dip normal (expected drop)
Ambulatory monitoring
A wearable cuff records BP automatically over 24 hours of normal life.
Home self-monitoring
Patients self-measure twice daily over a week using a validated device.
Out-of-office data removes clinic-induced bias.
Why it matters
Real-world averages correlate better with cardiovascular outcomes.
Office vs Out-of-Office Averages
Plotting both values together exposes which quadrant a patient falls into.
- 4: Possible patterns (diagnostic quadrants)
- ~15-30%: White-coat prevalence (of high office readers)
- ~10-15%: Masked prevalence (of normal office readers)
- 2: Axes compared (office vs home BP)
Two independent axes
Office BP and out-of-office BP are plotted on separate axes.
Four possible quadrants
Each combination maps to a distinct clinical category.
The quadrant, not either value alone, drives diagnosis.
Reading the marker
A single dot position summarizes the patient discrepancy pattern.
Discrepancy Classification
The quadrant a patient lands in determines over- or under-diagnosis risk.
- Q1: Normal-normal (true normotension)
- Q2: High-high (sustained hypertension)
- Q3: High-normal (white-coat hypertension)
- Q4: Normal-high (masked hypertension)
White-coat risk
High office, normal home — risk of unnecessary treatment.
Masked risk
Normal office, high home — risk of missed treatment.
Masked hypertension carries hidden cardiovascular risk.
Confirming sustained cases
Both readings elevated confirms genuine hypertension.
Diagnosis & Treatment Decision
Treatment follows the out-of-office pattern, not the office number alone.
- Yes: Overtreatment avoided (white-coat cases)
- Yes: Undertreatment avoided (masked cases)
- ABPM/HBPM: Guideline-recommended (before diagnosis)
- Higher: Outcome accuracy (vs office-only)
Avoiding overtreatment
White-coat patients skip unneeded medication and side effects.
Catching missed cases
Masked patients get treatment despite a reassuring office reading.
Correct classification changes real treatment decisions.
Better long-term care
Out-of-office-based diagnosis improves cardiovascular outcomes.
A simulator that demonstrates the discrepancy between office and real-world blood pressure readings and its impact on diagnosis, showcasing ambulatory and home monitoring techniques.
2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install