🥶 Manipulation Under Anesthesia vs Arthroscopic Capsular Release Simulator
A comparative simulator of two surgical approaches for resistant frozen shoulder — closed manual realignment under anesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release.
Frozen Shoulder Resistant To Conservative Care
Physical therapy and injections failed to restore motion.
- 80%: External rotation lost (below normal arc)
- 9-18: Symptom duration (months typical)
- ~60%: Conservative success rate (therapy alone)
- 4mm+: Capsule thickness (vs 1mm normal)
Adhesive capsulitis pathology
Chronic inflammation thickens and contracts the joint capsule.
Failed conservative treatment
Stretching, NSAIDs, and steroid injections stop working.
Indications for intervention
Severe restriction past six months triggers procedural options.
Manipulation Under Anesthesia Tears Adhesions
Surgeon forcibly moves the arm to rupture capsule.
- General: Anesthesia type (or regional block)
- High: Force applied (controlled leverage)
- 5-10: Procedure duration (minutes)
- +40%: Immediate ROM gain (average increase)
Manipulation technique
Short-lever forces stretch and rupture the contracted capsule.
Audible release
A palpable pop signals capsule and adhesion rupture.
Sequential direction release
Flexion, rotation, and abduction are stretched in order.
Manipulation Risk In Fragile Bone
Blunt force can fracture bone or tear tissue.
- ~1-2%: Fracture risk (osteoporotic humerus)
- ~1%: Rotator cuff tear risk (reported incidence)
- Rare: Labral injury risk (but documented)
- None: Direct visualization (closed technique)
Fracture vulnerability
Osteoporotic or elderly bone fractures under high torque.
Unpredictable tissue damage
Adhesions tear randomly without visual guidance.
No direct visualization
Surgeon cannot see which structures actually tore.
Arthroscopic Capsular Release Under Direct Vision
Camera-guided instruments precisely divide the contracted capsule.
- Direct: Visualization (via arthroscopic camera)
- Rotator interval: Structures divided (+ anterior/inferior capsule)
- 30-60: Procedure duration (minutes)
- <1%: Complication rate (lower than manipulation)
Portal placement
Small incisions admit camera and cutting instruments.
Selective capsule division
Radiofrequency or shaver divides only targeted adhesions.
Controlled range restoration
Motion is tested and refined after every cut.
Manipulation Versus Release Outcomes
Both restore motion; release offers more precise control.
- ~85%: Final ROM, manipulation (of normal arc)
- ~92%: Final ROM, release (of normal arc)
- 4-6: Recovery, manipulation (weeks)
- 6-10: Recovery, release (weeks)
Speed versus precision
Manipulation is faster; release is more controlled.
Risk-benefit tradeoff
Severe fibrosis favors release over blind manipulation.
Shared long-term success
Most patients regain functional motion within months.
A comparative simulator of two surgical approaches for resistant frozen shoulder — closed manual realignment under anesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release.
2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install