Home▸Caloric Restriction Mimetic Science▸Caloric Restriction Lifespan Extension Model Simulator

🍽 Caloric Restriction Lifespan Extension Model Simulator

The simulation models the effects of caloric restriction on lifespan extension, providing insights into physiological mechanisms and potential health benefits.

Caloric Restriction Mimetic Science2DModerate60 FPS
caloric-restriction-lifespan-simulator ↗ Open standalone

Lifespan Extension Is Conserved Across Diverse Species

Caloric restriction extends lifespan in yeast, worms, flies, and rodents.

  • +30–50%: Yeast lifespan gain (placeholder figure)
  • +40%: C. elegans gain (placeholder figure)
  • +15–30%: Mouse gain (placeholder figure)
  • 20+: Species studied (placeholder figure)

Conserved effect across taxa

Restriction extends lifespan broadly across evolutionarily distant organisms.

Magnitude varies by species

Shorter-lived organisms show larger relative extension than long-lived ones.

mTOR and IGF-1 Signaling Are Suppressed Under Restriction

Reduced nutrient intake downregulates growth-promoting signaling pathways.

  • ~40%: mTOR activity drop (placeholder figure)
  • ↓: IGF-1 levels (placeholder figure)
  • ↑: AMPK activation (placeholder figure)
  • ↑: Sirtuin expression (placeholder figure)

mTOR/IGF-1 axis

Growth-signaling pathways shift toward maintenance and repair modes.

AMPK and sirtuin activation

Energy-sensing pathways rise, promoting autophagy and stress resistance.

Lowered Metabolic Rate Reduces Cumulative Oxidative Stress

Restriction slows reactive oxygen species accumulation over the lifespan.

  • ↓: ROS output (placeholder figure)
  • ↑: Mitochondrial efficiency (placeholder figure)
  • ↓: Protein damage markers (placeholder figure)
  • ↓: DNA damage rate (placeholder figure)

Reduced ROS production

Lower throughput metabolism generates fewer damaging byproducts.

Slower macromolecular damage accrual

Cumulative cellular damage builds up more slowly over time.

Benefits Plateau and Reverse at Extreme Restriction Levels

Past a threshold, further restriction stops helping and starts harming.

  • ~20–30%: Optimal restriction range (placeholder figure)
  • >35–40%: Threshold for harm (placeholder figure)
  • ↑ risk: Immune function risk (placeholder figure)
  • ↑ risk: Muscle mass risk (placeholder figure)

Non-linear dose-response

Extension benefit follows an inverted-U shape rather than a straight line.

Risks of over-restriction

Excess restriction can impair immunity, fertility, and lean mass.

Applying These Findings to Humans Remains Highly Uncertain

Human trials show metabolic benefits but no confirmed lifespan extension yet.

  • 2 years: CALERIE trial duration (placeholder figure)
  • Limited: Human lifespan data (placeholder figure)
  • Mixed: Primate study consensus (placeholder figure)
  • Low–Moderate: Confidence level (placeholder figure)

Human trial evidence

Short-term human trials show improved biomarkers, not proven lifespan gains.

Open translational questions

Long human lifespans make direct extension trials impractical to confirm.

Placeholder callout: translation from short-lived models to humans is unresolved.
⚙ Under the hood

The simulation models the effects of caloric restriction on lifespan extension, providing insights into physiological mechanisms and potential health benefits.

CanvasBiomedicine

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)