Home▸Жовчнокам'яна хвороба та захворювання жовчного міхура▸Gallbladder Polyp Surveillance Simulator

🪨 Gallbladder Polyp Surveillance Simulator

An interactive model for monitoring gallbladder polyps, selecting the interval for ultrasound control based on the size of the polyp and risk factors for malignancy.

Жовчнокам'яна хвороба та захворювання жовчного міхура2DModerate60 FPS
gallbladder-polyp-surveillance-simulator ↗ Open standalone

A Polyp Turns Up on Ultrasound

Most gallbladder polyps are found by accident.

  • ~5%: Prevalence in adults (found on abdominal US)
  • <1%: Malignant at diagnosis (of all polyps)
  • Cholesterol: Most common type (benign, non-neoplastic)
  • 40–60: Typical age at finding (years old)

Why polyps get found

Abdominal ultrasound for unrelated symptoms often spots them.

Most are harmless

Cholesterol polyps make up the vast majority of cases.

The clinical question

Which polyps need watching, and which need surgery.

Measuring Polyp Diameter

Size is the single strongest predictor of malignancy risk.

  • <6 mm: Low-risk cutoff (rarely malignant)
  • 6–9 mm: Intermediate range (watch closely)
  • ≥10 mm: High-risk cutoff (surgery usually discussed)
  • B-mode US: Measurement tool (max diameter, no shadow)

Millimeters matter

Every extra millimeter shifts the risk calculation.

Measurement technique

Longest axis is measured on a static B-mode image.

Reproducibility

Repeat scans confirm true growth versus measurement noise.

Assessing Age, Growth, and Symptoms

Non-size factors can push a small polyp into a higher tier.

  • >50 yrs: Age flag (raises suspicion)
  • >2 mm/yr: Growth flag (on serial scans)
  • Biliary pain: Symptom flag (colic, PSC history)
  • Sessile: Morphology flag (broad-based, no stalk)

Age as a risk driver

Polyps found after age fifty carry more suspicion.

Interval growth

Rapid growth on repeat scans raises concern sharply.

Symptoms and comorbidity

Biliary colic or PSC history lowers the surgical threshold.

Sorting the Polyp Into a Risk Tier

Size and risk factors combine into a single risk level.

  • Green: Low risk tier (routine or no follow-up)
  • Orange: Intermediate tier (6–12 month US)
  • Red: High risk tier (cholecystectomy discussion)
  • Size + factors: Combined rule (not size alone)

Tiering logic

Size sets the baseline, risk factors shift it upward.

Threshold lowering

One risk factor can drop the surgical trigger to 6 mm.

Shared decision

Borderline cases weigh surgery against continued watching.

Setting the Follow-Up Ultrasound Interval

The risk tier maps onto a concrete rescan schedule.

  • 12 mo or none: Low risk (stable small polyps)
  • 6–12 mo: Intermediate risk (watch for growth)
  • Surgery: High risk (cholecystectomy referral)
  • No growth ×5yr: Stop criterion (surveillance may end)

Matching interval to risk

Higher risk tiers get shorter, closer-spaced scans.

When surveillance ends

Years of stability can retire a polyp from follow-up.

When surgery wins

Large or risk-laden polyps skip straight to referral.

⚙ Under the hood

An interactive model for monitoring gallbladder polyps, selecting the interval for ultrasound control based on the size of the polyp and risk factors for malignancy.

CanvasBiomedicine

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)