Home▸Atrial Fibrillation Management▸Rate Control vs Rhythm Control Decision Simulator

💓 Rate Control vs Rhythm Control Decision Simulator

A decision simulator for rate control versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AFib) based on symptoms and comorbidities, considering beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers as treatment options.

Atrial Fibrillation Management2DModerate60 FPS
afib-rate-vs-rhythm-control-simulator ↗ Open standalone

Placeholder title: Assessing Symptom Burden in Atrial Fibrillation

Placeholder lead sentence describing symptom scoring.

  • I–IV: EHRA symptom scale (Placeholder short caption)
  • ~30%: Asymptomatic AFib (Placeholder short caption)
  • ~55%: Palpitations reported (Placeholder short caption)
  • Variable: QoL impact score (Placeholder short caption)

Placeholder section heading: symptom scoring

Placeholder short paragraph about symptom burden assessment.

Placeholder title: Rate Control With Beta-Blockers and Calcium Channel Blockers

Placeholder lead sentence describing rate control approach.

  • <110 bpm: Target resting HR (Placeholder short caption)
  • β-blocker/CCB: First-line agents (Placeholder short caption)
  • Low complexity: Simplicity (Placeholder short caption)
  • Yes: Atria stay in AFib (Placeholder short caption)

Placeholder section heading: rate control mechanism

Placeholder short paragraph about slowing AV conduction.

Placeholder title: Rhythm Control With Antiarrhythmics and Ablation

Placeholder lead sentence describing rhythm restoration.

  • PVI: Catheter ablation (Placeholder short caption)
  • Class I/III: Antiarrhythmic drugs (Placeholder short caption)
  • Higher effort: Sinus restoration (Placeholder short caption)
  • Symptomatic pts: Best for (Placeholder short caption)

Placeholder section heading: rhythm control mechanism

Placeholder short paragraph about restoring sinus rhythm.

Placeholder title: Comorbidities That Shift the Decision

Placeholder lead sentence about heart failure and age.

  • Favors rhythm: Heart failure (Placeholder short caption)
  • Favors rate: Older / frail (Placeholder short caption)
  • Case-by-case: Structural disease (Placeholder short caption)
  • Weighted: Comorbidity index (Placeholder short caption)

Placeholder section heading: comorbidity weighting

Placeholder short paragraph about comorbidity effects.

Placeholder title: Choosing a Final Strategy

Placeholder lead sentence about the combined recommendation.

  • → Rhythm: High symptoms (Placeholder short caption)
  • → Rate: Low symptoms (Placeholder short caption)
  • Always: Shared decision (Placeholder short caption)
  • Periodically: Reassess (Placeholder short caption)

Placeholder section heading: final recommendation logic

Placeholder short paragraph summarizing the recommendation.

Placeholder highlight callout: individualize strategy choice.
⚙ Under the hood

A decision simulator for rate control versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AFib) based on symptoms and comorbidities, considering beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers as treatment options.

CanvasBiomedicine

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)