HomeArticlesElectrochemistry

Redox Titration: Why the Potential Jumps at the Equivalence Point

Track electrode potential instead of pH and a redox titration traces the same S-shaped curve — the size of the jump comes straight out of the Nernst equation.

mysimulator teamUpdated June 2026≈ 7 min read▶ Open the simulation

Swapping protons for electrons

A redox titration is structurally the mirror image of an acid-base titration: instead of protons moving between a weak acid and its conjugate base, electrons move between an oxidized and a reduced form of two chemical couples. The progress of the reaction is tracked not with a pH meter but with an inert electrode (typically platinum) reading the solution's electrode potential E, referenced against a standard electrode.

The Nernst equation drives the curve

Every redox half-reaction has its own Nernst equation relating the measured potential to the concentration ratio of its oxidized and reduced forms:

E = E° - (RT / nF) · ln( [Red] / [Ox] )

  E°  standard potential of the couple
  n   number of electrons transferred
  F   Faraday's constant

At any point during the titration both couples present in solution are, in principle, linked by the same electrode potential — but whichever couple has both its oxidized and reduced forms present in comparable, measurable amounts is the one whose Nernst equation effectively fixes E at that moment.

Before, at, and after equivalence

Before equivalence, the analyte couple dominates the measurable concentration ratio, so the analyte's own Nernst equation sets the potential. After equivalence, essentially all analyte has been consumed and it is the titrant couple's ratio, of excess oxidized titrant to reduced titrant produced, that sets E instead. The handoff between the two regimes happens right around equivalence, and it is exactly there that E rises steeply, because both concentration ratios are changing rapidly through several orders of magnitude with each small addition of titrant.

live demo · electrode potential tracing an S-curve as titrant is added● LIVE

The equivalence-point potential

Combining the two half-reaction Nernst equations with the stoichiometric condition that electrons lost by one couple equal electrons gained by the other at equivalence gives a closed-form expression for the equivalence-point potential: E_eq = (n1·E1° + n2·E2°) / (n1 + n2). When both couples transfer the same number of electrons this collapses to a simple average of the two standard potentials; when n1 ≠ n2 the couple with the larger n pulls the equivalence potential closer to its own standard potential.

What makes the jump sharp

The steepness of the potential jump near equivalence is set by how far apart the two couples' standard potentials sit. A large gap, roughly ΔE° > 0.2 V, gives a sharp, easily read jump — a titrant couple far more oxidizing than the analyte couple drives the reaction essentially to completion at every point, keeping the endpoint crisp. A small gap, ΔE° < 0.2 V, gives a shallow, gradual change that is much harder to pinpoint accurately, whether by eye with a redox indicator or by a potentiometric electrode.

Frequently asked questions

How is a redox titration different from an acid-base titration?

Both trace out an S-shaped curve as titrant is added and both have a steep jump at equivalence, but they track different quantities and different equilibria. An acid-base titration monitors pH, governed by proton-transfer equilibria and Henderson-Hasselbalch. A redox titration monitors electrode potential E, governed by electron-transfer equilibria and the Nernst equation for each redox couple present.

Why is the potential at the equivalence point not simply the average of the two standard potentials?

It is only a simple average, (n1·E1° + n2·E2°) / (n1 + n2), when both half-reactions transfer the same number of electrons (n1 = n2), which makes it collapse to (E1° + E2°)/2. When the two couples transfer different numbers of electrons, the equivalence potential is instead a weighted average favouring the couple with the larger n, derived by combining both Nernst equations with the stoichiometric electron-balance condition at equivalence.

What determines whether a redox titration's endpoint is sharp or gradual?

The size of the potential jump near equivalence scales with the difference between the two couples' standard potentials, ΔE°. A large ΔE° (roughly above 0.2 V) gives a sharp, easily detected jump; a small ΔE° gives a shallow, gradual change that is much harder to pinpoint precisely, whether by an indicator or by a potentiometric electrode.

Try it live

Everything above runs in your browser — open Redox Titration and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.

▶ Open Redox Titration simulation

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)