Every point on a wavefront is a new source
In 1678 Christiaan Huygens proposed a construction that still underlies how physicists reason about wave propagation: every point on a wavefront can be treated as the source of a new spherical (or circular, in 2D) secondary wavelet, and the wavefront a moment later is the envelope — the common tangent surface — of all those wavelets. It's a purely geometric recipe, and remarkably it reproduces straight-line propagation, reflection, refraction and diffraction all from the same single rule.
For an unobstructed plane wave, the wavelets from every point along the front reinforce constructively straight ahead and cancel everywhere else except in the forward direction, so the envelope stays a flat plane moving forward at speed c — the principle reduces to ordinary straight-line propagation exactly where you'd expect it to. The interesting behaviour appears the moment part of the wavefront is blocked.
Diffraction: what happens at an edge
When a wavefront meets a slit or an obstacle, the wavelets from the blocked portion of the front simply don't exist, so the envelope construction on the far side is now incomplete — it can no longer sum to a clean flat wavefront. Near the edges of the opening, wavelets spread the wave into the geometric shadow region, which is exactly what diffraction is: bending of a wave around an edge that a purely ray-optics picture (light travels in straight lines) can't explain at all. The narrower the slit relative to the wavelength, the more the remaining unblocked wavelets look like a single point source, and the more the transmitted wave resembles a circular wave spreading in all forward directions.
Single-slit and double-slit patterns as wavelet interference
For a single slit, every point across the opening emits a wavelet, and downstream at some observation angle θ, wavelets from different points across the slit have travelled slightly different path lengths and arrive with different phases. Summing all of them (formally, integrating over the slit width) gives constructive interference straight ahead and a series of intensity minima at angles satisfying:
a sinθ = mλ (single-slit minima, m = ±1, ±2, ...)
where a is the slit width and λ the wavelength — narrower slits push the first minimum out to a wider angle, spreading the beam more, which is the standard statement that diffraction gets stronger as the aperture shrinks toward the wavelength scale. For two slits, each slit is itself a Huygens source of a diffracted wave, and the two overlapping diffracted waves interfere with each other on top of each slit's own single-slit envelope, giving the familiar fine fringe pattern (from two-source interference) modulated by a broader single-slit diffraction envelope.
Why an obstacle doesn't just cast a clean shadow
Put a small opaque obstacle in the beam instead of a slit and Huygens' principle predicts something genuinely counterintuitive: wavelets diffracting around every edge of the obstacle can arrive back in phase exactly at the centre of the geometric shadow, producing a bright spot there — the Arago (Poisson) spot. It was proposed in 1818 as a reductio-ad-absurdum objection to Fresnel's wave theory of light by Poisson, who thought it obviously wrong; Arago then measured it and found the bright spot really is there, which became one of the most convincing early confirmations that light really is a wave.
From geometric rule to Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction theory
Huygens' original construction had a known flaw: it didn't explain why wavelets don't also produce a wave travelling backward, back toward the source. Augustin-Jean Fresnel fixed this by adding an obliquity factor that weights each wavelet's contribution by direction, suppressing the backward wave — the combined Huygens-Fresnel principle is what correctly predicts diffraction intensities, not just diffraction's existence. Gustav Kirchhoff later derived the same construction more rigorously directly from Maxwell's wave equation, putting Huygens' 17th-century geometric intuition on solid mathematical footing two centuries later.
Frequently asked questions
Does Huygens' principle work for all types of waves?
It works cleanly for waves obeying the standard wave equation in an odd number of spatial dimensions, which includes sound in 3D and light. In 2D (surface ripples on water, for instance) the wavelet construction technically produces trailing wakes rather than a clean sharp pulse, a subtlety usually ignored in the simple envelope picture used for teaching diffraction.
Why does a narrower slit spread light out more, not less?
A narrower slit means fewer distinct wavelet sources across its width contributing to the far-field sum, so the constructive-interference region (where all the path-length differences stay small) is confined to a wider range of angles before minima appear. The single-slit diffraction formula a·sinθ = mλ shows this directly: shrinking the slit width a pushes the first minimum out to a larger angle θ.
What is the Arago spot and why was it controversial?
It's a bright spot that appears at the exact centre of the shadow cast by a small circular obstacle, predicted by treating every point on the obstacle's edge as a Huygens wavelet source whose diffracted contributions arrive back in phase at the shadow's centre. Poisson raised it in 1818 as an argument against the wave theory of light, expecting it to be obviously false — but Arago measured it and confirmed it was really there, turning an intended refutation into strong evidence for wave optics.
Try it live
Everything above runs in your browser — open Huygens' Principle Simulator and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.
▶ Open Huygens' Principle Simulator simulation