Home▸Articles▸Engineering & Materials

Buy-to-Fly Ratio: Additive vs Subtractive Manufacturing

Understanding how subtractive and additive manufacturing processes impact material usage and cost.

mysimulator teamUpdated June 2026≈ 4 min read▶ Open the simulation

What is Buy-to-Fly Ratio?

The buy-to-fly ratio, also known as material utilization or material efficiency, refers to the amount of raw material required for a manufacturing process compared to the final product. In subtractive and additive manufacturing processes, this ratio can significantly differ due to their distinct methods of creating parts.

In subtractive manufacturing, such as CNC machining, the goal is to remove excess material from a solid block until only the desired part remains, leading to high waste rates. Conversely, in additive manufacturing (AM), like metal 3D printing, layers are added to build up the final part, resulting in minimal waste.

Subtractive vs Additive Manufacturing

CNC machining is a subtractive process that involves cutting away material from a solid billet or block until the desired shape is achieved. This method typically results in high buy-to-fly ratios, often around 20-30%, due to significant material waste.

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes like laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) build parts layer by layer, depositing only the necessary material. This approach can achieve much higher material utilization rates, sometimes reaching up to 95% for certain designs.

live demo · related simulation● LIVE

Impact on Cost and Design

The buy-to-fly ratio directly impacts the cost of manufacturing a part. Higher ratios in subtractive processes mean more waste and higher costs, while lower ratios in AM can lead to significant savings. This is especially important for industries where material costs are high.

Design considerations also play a crucial role. In AM, designers must account for the build direction and support structures, which can affect the final part's performance and cost. Subtractive processes offer more freedom but come with higher waste and cost implications.

Real-World Applications

The choice between subtractive and additive manufacturing depends on various factors including material type, design complexity, and production volume. For instance, aerospace components often benefit from AM due to its ability to create lightweight yet strong parts with complex geometries.

In contrast, industries like automotive and consumer goods may prefer CNC machining for simpler parts where cost and speed are critical.

Frequently asked questions

What is the buy-to-fly ratio in CNC machining?

The buy-to-fly ratio in CNC machining is typically around 20-30%, indicating that a significant portion of raw material is wasted during the manufacturing process.

How does additive manufacturing improve cost efficiency compared to subtractive methods?

Additive manufacturing can achieve much higher material utilization rates, often up to 95% for certain designs, reducing waste and lowering overall production costs.

Why is the buy-to-fly ratio important in design optimization?

The buy-to-fly ratio helps designers understand how efficiently their parts are being manufactured. Optimizing this ratio can lead to significant cost savings and material efficiency improvements.

Can both subtractive and additive manufacturing processes be used for the same part design?

Yes, but the choice between the two depends on factors such as material type, design complexity, production volume, and specific performance requirements. Each process has its strengths and is suited to different applications.

Try it live

Everything above runs in your browser — open Buy-to-Fly Ratio: Additive vs Subtractive Manufacturing and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.

▶ Open Buy-to-Fly Ratio: Additive vs Subtractive Manufacturing simulation

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)