Predicting Probabilities and Key Drivers of Legal Outcomes
Case outcome prediction estimates win/loss probabilities, settlement likelihoods, and timelines using historical case data. Models must be explainable, bias-tested, and used as advisory tools—not determinative decisions.
Provide better strategic insight, budgeting, and client communication while ensuring fairness and compliance.
Bias/Fairness Checks, Monitoring, Retraining, and Versioned Releases
Estimate ranges and timing.
Judge/Counsel Analysis
Scaling the Prediction System – Expanding Geos & Practices
Integrate docket APIs, matter systems, billing, and KM; store features, predictions, and model versions; enforce privacy and privilege safeguards.
Governance, Safety, and Explainability
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between predicted case outcomes and actual results?
Prediction vs actual gap.
How does model performance change over time – what is 'model drift'?
Model drift over time.
If a case has low predicted success odds, why might it still lead to an early settlement?
Low success odds led to early settlement, saving cost.
How can judge analysis influence the selection of a faster venue for a case?
Judge analysis shifted filing to faster venue.
▶ Try it live
Everything above runs in your browser — open Hash Function Avalanche Visualizer and change the parameters while it is running. Nothing is installed, nothing is uploaded, the whole model lives in one tab.