EN 
Українська
Polski
Español
Deutsch
日本語
Italiano
Português (BR)
Français
العربية
Nederlands
中文
한국어
हिन्दी
Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
Русский
Bahasa Indonesia
فارسی
বাংলা
ไทย
Filipino
Kiswahili
اردو
Bahasa Melayu
தமிழ்
עברית
Ελληνικά
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
አማርኛ
မြန်မာဘာသာ
ខ្មែរ
ქართული
नेपाली
Монгол хэл
Հայերեն
සිංහල
ລາວ
Čeština
Română
Magyar
Български
Svenska
Dansk
Suomi
Norsk
Slovenčina
Hrvatski
Српски
Slovenščina
Lietuvių
Latviešu
Eesti
Íslenska
Shqip
Македонски
Bosanski
Malti🏁 Rolling Motion — Sphere vs Cylinder vs Hoop on an Incline
Watch a sphere, cylinder and hoop race down an incline. See how moment of inertia decides the winner, independent of mass and radius, with live acceleration, velocity and rolling animation.
About Rolling Motion — Sphere vs Cylinder vs Hoop
When a sphere, a cylinder and a hoop of equal mass and equal outer radius are released together at the top of an incline and roll without slipping, gravity supplies each of them the same potential energy per metre descended, ΔPE = mgh. That energy has to pay for two kinds of motion at once: translation of the centre of mass (½mv²) and rotation about the centre (½Iω²). Because rolling without slipping links the two through ω = v/r, the fraction of the energy budget consumed by rotation depends only on how the body's mass is distributed relative to its radius — its moment of inertia, I. A solid sphere (I = ⅖mr²) keeps most of its mass close to the spin axis, so rotating it is "cheap" and most of the available energy converts into forward speed. A thin hoop (I = mr²) carries all its mass at the rim, so spinning it up is expensive, leaving less energy — and therefore less acceleration — for translation.
Solving Newton's second law for a body rolling without slipping down an incline of angle θ gives a strikingly simple result: a = g sinθ / (1 + I/(mr²)). Both m and r cancel completely, so a bowling-ball-sized sphere and a marble-sized sphere reach the bottom in exactly the same time, and so do a light cylinder and a heavy one. Only the dimensionless shape factor I/(mr²) matters: 2/5 for a solid sphere, 1/2 for a solid cylinder or disc, and 1 for a thin hoop or ring. Plugging these in gives the sphere an acceleration of (5/7)g sinθ, the cylinder (2/3)g sinθ, and the hoop only (1/2)g sinθ — sphere first, cylinder second, hoop always last, whatever the incline angle, mass or size. It is one of the most reliable and reproducible demonstrations in an introductory mechanics classroom.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this simulation actually show?
It races a solid sphere, a solid cylinder and a thin hoop — all with the same mass and outer radius — down the same incline, rolling without slipping. Each body's acceleration depends only on its moment-of-inertia shape factor, so the sphere reaches the bottom first, the cylinder second and the hoop last, every single time, regardless of the incline angle you choose.
Does the mass or radius of the objects matter for who wins?
No. The acceleration formula a = g sinθ / (1 + I/(mr²)) has mass and radius squared buried inside the moment-of-inertia term I/(mr²), and for any uniform sphere, cylinder or hoop this ratio is a fixed number — 2/5, 1/2 or 1 — independent of size or mass. A bowling ball and a tennis-ball-sized sphere of the same shape finish in exactly the same time; only the distribution of mass relative to the radius, the shape, decides the race.
What is the difference between rolling without slipping and sliding?
Rolling without slipping means the contact point between the object and the incline is momentarily at rest, linked by the constraint v = ωr, and static friction supplies the torque needed to spin the object up without any energy being lost. Pure sliding, by contrast, has kinetic friction acting over a moving contact patch, dissipating energy as heat. This simulation assumes ideal rolling — friction sufficient to prevent slipping, but doing no net work — the standard idealisation used in introductory mechanics.
Why does the hoop roll slower than the sphere even with equal mass?
Because the hoop's mass sits entirely at the rim (I = mr²), far from the spin axis, so a large share of the released gravitational potential energy has to go into spinning it up rather than moving it forward. The sphere's mass is spread closer to its centre (I = ⅖mr²), making it "reluctant" to spin, so more of the same energy budget becomes translational speed. Equal mass does not mean equal moment of inertia — shape and mass distribution are what matter.
Why don't we need a friction coefficient in this idealised model?
The simulation assumes there is exactly enough static friction to enforce rolling without slipping, but that friction does zero work because the contact point has no relative sliding velocity. In this idealisation the friction force's magnitude adjusts automatically to satisfy the rolling constraint, so it never appears explicitly in the acceleration formula — only the moment-of-inertia ratio does. A real incline would need a minimum coefficient of friction to avoid slipping, but that threshold does not change how fast the objects roll once rolling is guaranteed.
What would happen with a hollow sphere instead of a solid one?
A thin-walled hollow sphere has I = ⅔mr², larger than a solid sphere's ⅖mr² because its mass sits nearer the surface. Its acceleration would be a = g sinθ / (1 + 2/3) = (3/5)g sinθ — slower than a solid sphere but still faster than a solid cylinder's (2/3)g sinθ. It would finish between the sphere and the cylinder in this race.
What does this simulation ignore?
It ignores rolling resistance from surface deformation, air resistance, any wobble if the objects are not perfectly rigid or the incline not perfectly smooth, and the brief transient at release while friction ramps up to establish rolling. It also assumes each body is perfectly uniform in density and that the incline is rigid and straight for its full length.
What do the controls change?
The incline-angle slider (5° to 60°) sets θ, which scales every body's acceleration through g sinθ — steeper inclines make everyone faster but never change the finishing order. The incline-length slider (2 m to 8 m) sets how far each body must travel, changing the total race time without affecting who wins. The Race/Reset button restarts all three bodies from the top simultaneously so you can rerun the comparison.
Where does this physics apply in the real world?
The same shape-dependent rolling acceleration explains why a solid rubber ball outpaces a hollow ball or a bicycle wheel on a ramp, why engineers care about a wheel's moment of inertia when designing vehicles for acceleration, and why flywheels — essentially thick hoops — are deliberately used to store rotational energy rather than translate quickly. It remains the classic physics-lecture demonstration for introducing moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy.
Watch a sphere, cylinder and hoop race down an incline. See how moment of inertia decides the winner, independent of mass and radius, with live acceleration, velocity and rolling animation.
2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install