Home▸Medical Technology & Imaging Physics▸Digital Therapeutic Adherence: Static vs Adaptive

📱 Digital Therapeutic Adherence: Static vs Adaptive

Run a simulated multi-week digital therapeutic course and watch adherence decay week over week in a static program versus an adaptive program that fires engagement interventions — compare cumulative treatment effect against a clinically-meaningful threshold.

Medical Technology & Imaging Physics2DEasy60 FPS

Run the same simulated patient-behavior pattern through a static, one-size-fits-all digital therapeutic and an adaptive one that fires re-engagement interventions, then compare cumulative treatment effect against a clinically-meaningful threshold.

🔬 What It Demonstrates

A fixed-content program's adherence erodes as fatigue accumulates over the course; an adaptive program that shortens sessions and nudges the patient at the right moment keeps adherence — and therefore accumulated clinical benefit — much higher through the same course length.

🎮 How to Use

Set course length, simulation speed, static decay strength and adaptive intervention sensitivity, then watch both weekly adherence and cumulative treatment effect update live for both programs, running on one shared patient seed.

💡 Did You Know?

Real-world digital therapeutic trials consistently show adherence as the strongest predictor of clinical outcome — a program that isn't used consistently for its full prescribed course rarely reaches the effect size seen in its clinical trial.

⚙ Under the hood

digital therapeuticstreatment adherenceadaptive engagementdropoutmental health appgamificationclinical threshold

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install