Home▸Education & Learning Tools▸Queen Rearing Methods Compared (2D)

Queen Rearing Methods Compared (2D)

2D queen-rearing lab: the same acceptance-rate model as the 3D hives, plotted as a live success-vs-larva-age curve for Grafting, Miller, Doolittle and the Cloake board, with a tunable batch-yield readout.

Education & Learning Tools2DModerate60 FPS📱 Mobile-adapted⇄ 3D version
2d-queen-rearing-methods-compared-grafting-miller-doolittle-cloake-lab ↗ Open standalone

This 2D companion drives the same acceptance-rate model as the 3D hive rigs — Grafting, Miller, Doolittle and the Cloake board — through a plain canvas readout built for reading the numbers rather than orbiting a scene: a live curve plots each method's success rate across the full 4–60 hour larva-age range with a marker at your current setting, and a batch-yield panel converts each method's percentage into an expected count of capped queen cells for the batch size you choose, so the age-sensitivity differences between grafting-dependent methods and the far more forgiving Miller method are visible as whole curves rather than single snapshots.

⚙ Under the hood

2D queen-rearing lab with a live success-vs-larva-age curve and cell-yield bars for Grafting, Miller, Doolittle and the Cloake board, sharing the acceptance-rate model from the 3D version.

queen rearinggraftingcloake boardbeekeeping methodsqueen beeeducation

2D · HTML5 Canvas 2D · 60 FPS target · runs fully client-side, no install

What did you find?

Add reproduction steps (optional)