The von K�rm�n Vortex Street
When a uniform flow encounters a bluff body (a cylinder, bridge pier, chimney, or cable), the wake behind it undergoes a dramatic instability above a critical Reynolds number. The symmetric wake breaks down into an alternating pattern of counter-rotating vortices � the von K�rm�n vortex street, first analysed mathematically by Theodore von K�rm�n in 1911.
The shedding frequency f is remarkably universal, governed by the Strouhal number:
The key regimes for a circular cylinder:
| Re | Flow Regime | Wake Character |
|---|---|---|
| < 5 | Creeping / Stokes flow | No separation, symmetric streamlines fore/aft |
| 5 � 48 | Steady separated | Symmetric recirculation bubbles; no shedding |
| ~47 | Hopf bifurcation | Onset of oscillatory instability (symmetry breaking) |
| 48 � 180 | Laminar shedding | Periodic vortex street; St � 0.12�0.20 |
| 180 � 400 | Transitional | 3D instabilities (Mode A/B); St � 0.19�0.21 |
| 400 � 3�105 | Subcritical turbulent | Laminar b.l., turbulent wake; St � 0.20 |
| > 3�105 | Supercritical turbulent | Turbulent b.l.; drag crisis; St � 0.27 |
Engineering Consequences
Vortex-induced vibration (VIV) occurs when the shedding frequency locks onto a structural natural frequency. Famous examples:
- Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1940) � catastrophic torsional flutter driven by vortex-induced resonance at Re � 1.1 � 107 (wind speed 19 m/s, D = 8 m deck width).
- Chimney stacks � industrial chimneys vibrate at Strouhal frequencies; helical strakes (fin-like spirals) break the coherence of shedding to suppress VIV.
- Offshore risers � flexible pipes connecting seabed pipelines to surface platforms can vibrate destructively at VIV frequencies; active flow control or fairings are used.
- Overhead power cables � galloping and vortex-induced singing; dampers are added to transmission lines.
Lattice Boltzmann Method (D2Q9)
Rather than solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations directly, this simulator uses the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) � a mesoscopic approach that tracks particle distribution functions f_i(x, t) on a lattice. Each cell stores 9 populations corresponding to particles resting or moving in 8 compass directions.
D2Q9 Lattice Velocities
BGK Collision (Single Relaxation Time)
Boundary Conditions
| Boundary | Type | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Cylinder surface / walls | No-slip (bounce-back) | f_i ? f_OPP(i) at obstacle nodes � reverses momentum |
| Left inlet | Constant velocity (Dirichlet) | f_i set to f_i^eq(?=1, U0, 0) each step |
| Right outlet | Zero-gradient (extrapolation) | f_i at x=N-1 copied from x=N-2 each step |
| Top/bottom | No-slip walls | Bounce-back (included in obstacle mask) |
Vorticity Visualisation
Preset Scenarios Explained
🌀 Low Re (Re = 50)
Below the critical Reynolds number (~47), the wake behind the cylinder is steady and symmetric. Two recirculation bubbles (F�ppl vortices) sit in the near wake but no shedding occurs. The drag is dominated by pressure (form) drag. Observe the stable symmetric vorticity pattern without any periodic behaviour.
🔄 Transition (Re = 120)
Just above the Hopf bifurcation (~Re 47), the symmetric wake becomes unstable and periodic shedding begins. The vortex street is laminar and very regular � nearly sinusoidal lift oscillation on the cylinder. The shedding frequency matches St � 0.16�0.18 at this Re.
🌀 Vortex Street (Re = 200)
The classic von K�rm�n vortex street at Re = 200: strong alternating vortices are shed and convect downstream, forming two staggered rows. The street persists far downstream. St � 0.20. The alternating lift force oscillates at f_shed; drag oscillates at 2�f_shed.
🔗 Tandem Cylinders (Re = 160)
Two cylinders placed in series, centre-to-centre distance ~4.5D. The downstream cylinder interacts with the wake of the upstream one � both modifying and being modified by the vortex street. Gap ratio, Re, and cylinder spacing determine whether the wakes merge immediately or whether the downstream cylinder experiences galloping or bistable gap flows.
🏛️ Near Wall (Re = 200)
A cylinder near a flat wall with gap ratio G/D � 0.7. The wall modifies the vortex street asymmetrically: wall-side vortices are suppressed and shed at lower frequency. Below G/D � 0.3, shedding ceases entirely and the cylinder is deflected toward the wall (Magnus-Bernoulli effect). Used in modelling pipelines on the seabed.
🔇 Suppressed (Re = 220, splitter plate)
A rigid splitter plate extending 3.5D downstream of the cylinder separates the shear layers and prevents the roll-up interaction that triggers shedding. This eliminates the alternating lift force and reduces drag by ~40%. The wake remains a thin, steady central jet flanked by two symmetric vorticity layers that diffuse without coalescing.
Key Equations and Analysis
Reynolds Number and Length Scale
Strouhal Number and Shedding Frequency
Mean Drag Coefficient vs Re (circular cylinder)
| Re | C_D (mean) | C_L (amplitude) | St |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | ~1.55 (steady) | 0 | � (steady) |
| 100 | ~1.35 | ~0.30 | ~0.165 |
| 200 | ~1.30 | ~0.60 | ~0.195 |
| 400 | ~1.25 | ~0.75 | ~0.206 |
| 104�105 | ~1.0�1.2 | ~0.5�1.0 | ~0.20 |
| >3�105 | ~0.35 (drag crisis) | � | ~0.27 |
Vortex-Induced Vibration Lock-in Criterion
Curriculum Connections
| Topic | Qualification | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Fluid mechanics fundamentals | A-Level Physics / IB HL | Viscosity, Reynolds number, laminar vs turbulent flow |
| Aerodynamics and drag | A-Level / Engineering | Pressure drag, skin friction, boundary layer separation |
| Oscillations and resonance | A-Level / Undergraduate | Strouhal frequency, vortex-induced vibration, lock-in |
| Computational fluid dynamics | Engineering / Masters | LBM, finite difference/volume, boundary conditions |
| Structural engineering | Civil / Mechanical Engineering | Wind loading, VIV, fatigue, passive flow control |