🔺 VSEPR Theory — Predicting Molecular Geometry

Set bonding and lone pairs on a central atom and watch VSEPR theory snap the molecule into its correct 3D shape — from linear to octahedral — with real bond-angle compression from lone pairs.

ChemistryInteractive
Central atom (blue) with bonded atoms (amber) and lone-pair electron clouds (pink) arranged at VSEPR-predicted angles — a slowly rotating pseudo-3D view

How it Works

Every electron pair around a central atom — bonding or lone — repels every other pair and pushes to get as far away as possible, which is why they settle into the specific idealized angles shown here: 2 pairs go linear (180°), 3 go trigonal planar (120°), 4 go tetrahedral (109.5°), 5 go trigonal bipyramidal (90°/120°), and 6 go octahedral (90°). Adjust the bonding-pair and lone-pair sliders (or jump to a known molecule) and the canvas smoothly re-settles into the matching arrangement, spinning slowly so the pseudo-3D shape is easier to read.

Because lone pairs are not drawn as atoms when a chemist names a molecule's shape, the simulator tracks two geometries at once: the electron-pair geometry (all pairs, including lone ones, at their idealized positions) and the molecular geometry (only the bonded atoms). Lone-pair electron density sits closer to the central atom's own nucleus than a shared bonding pair does, so it repels its neighbors harder — this is why each lone pair squeezes the remaining bond angle a little tighter than the idealized value, exactly as it does in real ammonia and water.

Steric number (SN) = bonding pairs + lone pairs
SN=2 → Linear (180°, sp) · SN=3 → Trigonal planar (120°, sp²)
SN=4 → Tetrahedral (109.5°, sp³) · SN=5 → Trig. bipyramidal (90°/120°, sp³d)
SN=6 → Octahedral (90°, sp³d²)
Repulsion strength: lone-lone > lone-bond > bond-bond

Frequently Asked Questions

What does VSEPR theory predict, and what is its core principle?

VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) theory predicts the 3D arrangement of atoms around a central atom in a molecule. Its core principle is that all electron pairs surrounding a central atom — whether they are shared in a bond or sitting alone as a lone pair — repel each other and arrange themselves in space to be as far apart as possible, minimizing that repulsion.

What is the difference between electron-pair geometry and molecular geometry, and why can they differ?

Electron-pair geometry describes the arrangement of all electron pairs (bonding and lone) around the central atom. Molecular geometry describes only the positions of the bonded atoms, ignoring the lone pairs' own positions even though their repulsion still shapes the arrangement. When lone pairs are present, the two geometries diverge — for example, four total pairs with one lone pair still have tetrahedral electron-pair geometry, but the molecular geometry is trigonal pyramidal, like ammonia (NH₃).

Why do lone pairs compress bond angles more than bonding pairs?

A lone pair's electron density is held close to a single nucleus, while a bonding pair is shared and pulled between two nuclei, spreading it out more. That makes lone pairs more spatially diffuse and more repulsive toward neighboring electron pairs. The resulting order of repulsion strength is lone pair–lone pair > lone pair–bond pair > bond pair–bond pair, which is why each additional lone pair squeezes the remaining bond angles a little tighter.

What is hybridization, and how does it relate to VSEPR geometry?

Hybridization is the mixing of a central atom's atomic orbitals into a new set of equivalent hybrid orbitals that match the number of electron-pair domains predicted by VSEPR. Four electron pairs correspond to sp³ hybridization (tetrahedral electron-pair geometry), five pairs to sp³d (trigonal bipyramidal), and six pairs to sp³d² (octahedral), and so on.

How can you predict a molecule's polarity from its VSEPR geometry?

Symmetric geometries with identical substituents and no lone pairs on the central atom — like the linear CO₂ or tetrahedral CH₄ — have their individual bond dipoles cancel out, making the molecule nonpolar overall. Asymmetric geometries, or ones where lone pairs break the symmetry of the arrangement, usually leave a net dipole and are polar, as in bent H₂O or trigonal pyramidal NH₃.

Why does water have a bent shape with a bond angle of about 104.5° instead of the ideal 109.5°?

Water's oxygen atom has four electron pairs — two bonding pairs to hydrogen and two lone pairs — giving it tetrahedral electron-pair geometry. Naming only the positions of the two hydrogen atoms gives a bent molecular geometry, and the two lone pairs' extra repulsion pushes the remaining H-O-H bond angle down from the idealized 109.5° to roughly 104.5°.

Why is ammonia's H-N-H angle (about 107°) different from methane's H-C-H angle (109.5°)?

Both nitrogen in NH₃ and carbon in CH₄ have four electron pairs and tetrahedral electron-pair geometry. But methane's four pairs are all bonding pairs, so its bond angles stay at the ideal 109.5°. Ammonia has one lone pair among its four pairs, and that lone pair's stronger repulsion compresses the three N-H bond angles down to about 107°.

Does VSEPR theory treat a double or triple bond differently from a single bond?

No — VSEPR theory counts a double bond or triple bond to one neighboring atom as a single electron-pair domain, in the same way it counts a single bond, because all the electron density of a multiple bond points in one overall direction from the central atom. This simulator focuses on the standard case of single bonding pairs and lone pairs, which covers the great majority of introductory VSEPR examples.

Why does molecular geometry matter in the real world?

A molecule's 3D shape governs how it interacts with other molecules — enzymes and drug receptors recognize target molecules largely through shape complementarity, so predicting geometry from a Lewis structure is a foundational skill in chemistry and biochemistry. It's also why water's bent, polar shape gives it its unusually strong hydrogen bonding and solvent properties, a topic covered in other simulations on this site.

About this simulation

Written by MySimulator Team · Reviewed by MySimulator Editorial Review

Last updated: 11 July 2026

This simulator turns the abstract rules of VSEPR theory into a rotating pseudo-3D model you can build yourself. Choose how many bonding pairs and lone pairs surround a central atom — or jump straight to a known molecule like water or xenon tetrafluoride — and watch the arrangement settle into the correct idealized geometry, while a separate readout reports the real, lone-pair-compressed bond angle chemists actually measure.

🔬 What it shows

Two geometries side by side: the electron-pair geometry (every pair, bonding and lone, at its idealized VSEPR position) drawn as the rotating shape, and the molecular geometry (only the bonded atoms) reported as the named shape, from linear all the way to octahedral.

🎮 How to use

Drag the bonding-pair and lone-pair sliders to explore any combination up to six total pairs, pick a preset molecule to see a real textbook example snap into place, and flip the bond-angle-arc toggle to see the idealized angle labeled directly on the rotating shape.

💡 Did you know?

Water and methane both start from the same tetrahedral electron-pair geometry, but water's two lone pairs squeeze its H-O-H angle down to about 104.5° — a few degrees tighter than ammonia's single-lone-pair 107°, and noticeably less than methane's undisturbed 109.5°.

Frequently asked questions

How do I read the "electron-pair geometry" vs "molecular geometry" stats in this simulator?

Electron-pair geometry always reflects the total number of pairs (bonding + lone) arranged at idealized VSEPR angles — this is what the canvas actually draws the positions at. Molecular geometry is the shape you'd name if you only looked at the bonded atoms and ignored the lone-pair clouds, which is the name chemists actually use to describe a molecule's shape.

What do the amber circles and the softer pink clouds represent in the animation?

The amber circles are bonded atoms — real atoms attached to the central (blue) atom by a bond. The softer, larger pink clouds are lone pairs: they aren't atoms at all, just electron density that still occupies space and pushes on its neighbors, so they're drawn as diffuse "clouds" rather than solid circles.

Why does XeF2 end up linear even though the central atom has three lone pairs?

XeF2 has five total electron pairs (two bonding, three lone), so its electron-pair geometry is trigonal bipyramidal. The three lone pairs settle into the three equatorial positions, where they experience the least 90° repulsion, leaving the two bonded fluorine atoms in the two axial positions — directly opposite each other — which is why the molecular geometry comes out linear.

How is the "actual" (adjusted) bond angle calculated in this simulator?

For well-studied molecules like NH3, H2O, SF4, ClF3 and BrF5, this simulator uses the real experimentally measured bond angles. For other combinations of bonding and lone pairs, it estimates the adjustment using the standard VSEPR rule of thumb that each additional lone pair compresses the neighboring bond angle somewhat below the idealized value.

What determines whether the simulator calls a shape polar or nonpolar?

The simulator checks whether the resulting molecular geometry is one of the inherently symmetric shapes — linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, square planar or octahedral — where identical bond dipoles cancel by symmetry. Any other, less symmetric shape (bent, trigonal pyramidal, seesaw, T-shaped, square pyramidal) is marked polar.

What are some other real molecules I can check with the preset dropdown?

The preset dropdown jumps straight to twelve textbook molecules spanning every steric number from two to six: CO2, BF3, CH4, NH3, H2O, PCl5, SF4, ClF3, XeF2, SF6, BrF5 and XeF4 — between them they cover every standard VSEPR molecular geometry taught in an introductory chemistry course.