Micrometeorite Shield Test (3D test bench)

A light-gas gun fires a particle through a vacuum chamber at a two-plate Whipple shield; watch the debris cloud form, cross the standoff gap and load the rear wall.

Switch to 2D

Presets

Playback

Particle

Shield

Animation and display

Camera

Layers

Quality

Model check

The science

Hypervelocity impact on a Whipple shield. Orbital debris and micrometeoroids hit at 3 to 20 km/s, far above the speed of sound in metal, so the target behaves like a fluid and a thin sacrificial plate (the bumper) is enough to shatter a particle many times its own thickness. The fragments then spread across the standoff gap, so the same momentum lands on a much larger area of the rear wall.

Stage 1, bumper. Penetration scale: P = d (rp/rw)^1/2 (vn/c)^2/3 with vn = v cos(theta) and c = 5.4 km/s. A thin plate is perforated when t/cos(theta) is below 1.8 P. The shattered fraction is f = [1 - exp(-(vn/3 km/s)^2)] [1 - exp(-(t/(d cos theta))/0.12)]: a thick, fast bumper makes a cloud, a thin or slow one leaves an intact slug.

Conservation. The projectile plus the bumper plug it punches out (mass mp + mb) split into a cloud (fraction f) and a slug (1 - f). Their forward momentum can never exceed the incident normal momentum mp vn (the bumper rim takes the rest) and their kinetic energy is below the incident energy; the missing part becomes heat, melt and vapour.

Stage 2, standoff. The cloud half-angle is tan(phi) = 0.12 + 0.2 [1 - exp(-vn/6 km/s)], so after a standoff S its radius is Rc = dh/2 + S tan(phi). Parabolic areal loading gives a peak impulse I = 2 Mc vc / (pi Rc^2), which falls roughly as 1/S^2: doubling the gap cuts the load about four times.

Stage 3, rear wall. The wall absorbs the impulse as plastic work: I^2/(2 rw t) = sigma_y t eps_f, so I_crit = L sqrt(2 eps_f) t sqrt(rw sigma_y) with eps_f = 0.15 and a localisation factor L = 0.35 (peak loading is concentrated, so the wall fails below its plate-average capacity). I/I_crit above 1 perforates the wall, above 0.55 it bulges and spalls. An intact slug is judged separately with the same penetration scale.

Honest limits. This is a transparent scaling model with illustrative constants, not a hydrocode and not a certified ballistic limit equation; real shields add MLI blankets, Nextel or Kevlar layers and are qualified by light-gas-gun tests and simulation. No particular spacecraft is represented. Real numbers: ISS modules use bumpers of about 1 to 2 mm with 100 mm or more standoff.

What to try

  • Load Thin bumper (fails): the bumper no longer shatters the particle and the slug perforates the wall. Raise the bumper to 1 mm and watch f approach 1.
  • Drag Standoff from 30 to 300 mm and watch the peak impulse drop like 1/S^2.
  • Raise the speed at fixed size: the cloud cone widens and the critical diameter curve turns over.
  • Tilt the impact to 60 deg: the cloud axis moves sideways by S tan(theta) and the effective bumper gets thicker.
Loading model...
Loading Blender model...
Critical particle diameter vs impact speed
Rear-wall impulse profile vs limit
Outcome map (blue stopped, green held, yellow spall, red perforated)
Peak load vs standoff
Made with 🟠 Blender · Three.js