Meteor Impact Crater - 2D Cross-Section, Ejecta Blanket and Scaling Laws

Choose an impactor and read off the energy, crater size and how it changes on other worlds.

Presets

Playback

Parameters

Model checks

The science

Energy and crater size

The kinetic energy is E = ½ m v2 with m = ρi π L3 / 6; one megaton of TNT is 4.184×1015 J. The transient crater diameter follows the pi-group scaling of Collins, Melosh and Marcus (2005) for a non-porous target: Dtc = 1.161 (ρi/ρt)1/3 L0.78 v0.44 g-0.22 sin1/3θ. A simple bowl crater ends up about 1.25 times wider after the rim slumps; above a transition diameter of about 3.2 km on Earth (inversely proportional to g) the crater is complex and Df = 1.17 Dtc1.13 / Dc0.13. The ejecta blanket thickness falls off as r-3 (McGetchin et al., 1973).

What it shows

The scaling is a fit to experiments and numerical models, so the output is an estimate good to a factor of order 1.5. The check compares it with Barringer Meteor Crater, Arizona.

Honest simplifications: atmospheric entry and break-up are not modelled (small stony bodies burst in the air), porosity and layered targets are ignored, depth values use fixed depth-to-diameter rules and the ejecta profile is idealised. Educational model only.

What to try
  • Pick Meteor Crater (Arizona): the model gives a crater of about 1.3 km, close to the real 1.19 km.
  • Raise the impact speed: the crater grows only as v0.44 while the energy grows as v2.
  • Choose Same rock on the Moon: lower gravity makes a larger crater, by g-0.22.
  • Lower the impact angle: grazing impacts dig smaller craters (sin1/3θ).
Crater diameter against impactor diameter
Impact energy against impactor diameter
Crater diameter against impact speed