Light stays inside a nanoscale waveguide core only when it strikes the core–cladding boundary at an angle beyond the critical angle θc = asin(n₂/n₁) — beyond that angle total internal reflection (TIR) sends 100% of the light back into the core, so it zig-zags down the guide instead of leaking out.
Whether the guide supports one mode or several is set by the normalized frequency (V-number), computed from the core half-width a = width/2:
V = (2π·a/λ)·√(n₁² − n₂²)
guided TE modes m exist while V > m·π/2
single-mode (only TE₀) when V < π/2 ≈ 1.5708
Each guided mode's transverse field shape is found by solving the slab dispersion relation for the confined (u) and evanescent (w) wavenumbers, with u² + w² = V²:
even modes: u·tan(u) = w
odd modes: −u·cot(u) = w
The field profile panel plots the resulting standing-wave pattern inside the core (sinusoidal) matched to an exponentially decaying evanescent tail in the cladding — the physical reason a narrower core or lower index contrast pushes more of the light's energy outside the core itself.
- Core width — a narrower core raises V more slowly, favoring single-mode operation; too narrow and confinement weakens (larger evanescent tail).
- Wavelength — V scales as 1/λ, so shorter wavelengths push a fixed geometry toward multi-mode.
- Core / cladding index — the contrast n₁²−n₂² sets both the critical angle and V; silicon-on-insulator (n₁≈3.48, n₂≈1.44) is deliberately kept sub-micron-wide to stay single-mode despite the huge contrast.
Real-world relevance: this is exactly the design trade-off behind silicon photonic interconnects and integrated optical chips — the core must be narrow enough for single-mode routing, yet wide enough to keep loss from the evanescent tail low.