Five bee products, five different evidence-to-risk profiles. Pick a product and a dose, toggle medical supervision, and watch the honeycomb evidence board and healing/risk meters respond the way the actual research does.
How it works ▾
Every product on the honeycomb board carries two fixed numbers pulled from the article: an evidence strength (how solid the clinical support is) and a base risk (chance of an adverse reaction per unit dose). Honey's wound/cough evidence is strong and its risk is near zero; bee venom is the reverse.
healRate = evidence(product) · dose · dt
Healing accumulates while a session runs, saturating near 100% — well-supported products climb quickly even at modest doses, thin-evidence products crawl.
risk = baseRisk(product) · dose · (supervised ? 0.15 : 1.0)
Medical supervision is modelled as a flat ~85% risk reduction, matching the article's point that legitimate bee-venom use only happens under clinical supervision with emergency care on hand. Unsupervised high-dose venom crosses a reaction threshold and triggers a visible anaphylaxis-risk alert with healing knocked back — exactly the "real biology, real risk" trade-off the article describes.
- Product — selects the evidence/risk pair and recolours the bees, honeycomb cell and healing ring.
- Dose — scales both healing rate and risk together; there is no free lunch.
- Supervision — the single biggest risk lever, especially for venom.