Each hive "case" has one true underlying cause, hidden from you. Five candidate causes start with a flat prior P(c) = 1/5. Every diagnostic test you run reports a real (simulated) positive/negative result, and the belief over causes is updated with Bayes' rule, treating tests as conditionally independent given the cause (a naive-Bayes classifier — the same math used by real spam filters and medical triage tools):
P(cause | evidence) ∝ P(evidence | cause) × P(cause)
posterior(c) = prior(c) × L(c) / Σ_c' [ prior(c') × L(c') ]
L(c) = P(test positive | c) if the test came back positive
L(c) = 1 - P(test positive | c) if it came back negative
Uncertainty is tracked with Shannon entropy over the posterior distribution — it starts at log₂(5) ≈ 2.32 bits (maximum confusion) and falls toward 0 as evidence narrows things down:
H = -Σ_c p(c) · log₂ p(c)
This mirrors the article's five-step troubleshooting process: identification (a new case appears with a hidden cause), critical thinking (choosing which test actually reduces entropy instead of guessing), solution development (picking a diagnosis from the dropdown), implementation (the "Implement Fix" button), and evaluation (the reveal — was the fix actually right, and how much did it cost in tests?). Rushing to implement before entropy is low is exactly the "skip identification" shortcut the article warns against.
- Cause spheres grow and brighten as their posterior probability rises; each test node lights green (positive) or red (negative) once run, and glowing particles carry the belief update from the test to every cause.
- Some tests are cheap and broad, others narrow but costlier — the rational strategy is the one that cuts entropy fastest per unit cost, not the one you happen to try first.