Planetary Gearset

2D twin of the 3D planetary gearbox: the same epicyclic constraint solver, shown as a plan view with adjustable tooth counts and a choice of the held member.

Presets

Playback

Gear set

A planetary set has three coaxial members, sun, ring and carrier. Hold one, drive another, and the third is the output. The ring has Zr = Zs + 2 Zp teeth, so changing the tooth counts changes every ratio.

Held member and drive

Model checks

The science

What is modelled

One sun gear (Zs teeth), several planets (Zp teeth) on a carrier and an internal ring gear with Zr = Zs + 2 Zp teeth. Meshing forces the surface speeds at the sun-planet and planet-ring contacts to match, which gives one kinematic constraint between the three coaxial speeds.

Equations

  • Willis: Zs (ωs - ωc) + Zr (ωr - ωc) = 0.
  • Planet spin: ωp - ωc = -(Zs/Zp)(ωs - ωc).
  • Ideal torques: Ts : Tr : Tc = Zs : Zr : -(Zs + Zr).
  • Assembly: (Zs + Zr)/N must be an integer for N equally spaced planets.

Checks run in the page

  • Ratios 3:1, 1.5:1 and -2:1 for 24/12/48 teeth.
  • The Willis relation for several tooth combinations and held members.
  • Net power is zero for the ideal torque split.
  • Integrated tooth counts passing the mesh.

Honest simplifications

Ideal, lossless meshing with rigid teeth: no efficiency loss, backlash, load sharing between planets or tooth strength. Gear teeth are drawn schematically and are not true involute profiles.

What to try
  • Press the three presets to compare 3:1, 1.5:1 and the reversing -2:1 set.
  • Press Assembly fails: with 24 + 48 teeth, 72 / 5 is not an integer, so five equally spaced planets cannot mesh; three, four or six can.
  • Increase sun teeth with ring held: the reduction ratio falls towards 1.
Member speeds versus input speed
Speed ratio versus tooth ratio
Ideal torque on each member
Speed history
Made with 🤖 ChatGPT