Blending hydrogen into a natural-gas (mostly methane, CH₄) pipeline is a real decarbonisation strategy: existing steel networks can carry a limited fraction of H₂ without new infrastructure. Two properties change immediately with the blend fraction x (volume share of H₂):
LHV_blend = x·LHV_H2 + (1−x)·LHV_CH4
LHV_H2 ≈ 10.8 MJ/m³, LHV_CH4 ≈ 35.8 MJ/m³
ρ_blend = x·ρ_H2 + (1−x)·ρ_CH4
ρ_H2 ≈ 0.0899 kg/m³, ρ_CH4 ≈ 0.717 kg/m³
Wobbe Index = LHV_blend / √(ρ_blend / ρ_air)
The Wobbe Index is what actually matters for downstream burners — it predicts the heat delivered through a fixed orifice, so appliances are only rated for a narrow Wobbe band. Because H₂ carries roughly a third of methane's volumetric energy, blending lowers both the Wobbe Index and the delivered energy density even though volumetric flow stays the same.
The embrittlement-risk readout is a simplified, illustrative model of a real material-science effect: atomic hydrogen diffuses into steel under pressure and reduces its fracture toughness. Industry guidance commonly treats ~20% H₂ by volume as a rough ceiling for unmodified steel pipelines at typical distribution pressures — risk here scales with blend fraction × pressure, and drops sharply for hydrogen-rated composite/polymer pipe, which is far less susceptible.
- H₂ blend fraction — volumetric share of hydrogen injected at the T-junction; recolors the particle stream and recomputes every readout.
- Pipeline pressure — higher pressure drives more hydrogen into the pipe wall, raising embrittlement risk for the same blend fraction.
- Flow speed — visual/model transport speed of gas through the network (m/s equivalent).
- Pipe material — carbon steel is the incumbent, cost-effective choice but embrittlement-limited; composite/polymer pipe tolerates far higher blends at the cost of new infrastructure.