Photovoltaic Cell in Plan and Section (2D): I-V Curve, Fill Factor and Grid Finger Losses

Plan of the silicon cell grid and a cross-section across the fingers: the same single-diode model, grid shading and resistance trade-off, temperature and loss budget as the 3D page.

Switch to 3D

Presets

Playback

Parameters

Camera

Layers

Quality

Model check

The science

What you see. A 156 mm silicon solar cell lies on a test chuck under a lamp. The silver fingers and busbars on top collect the current that the cell generates; the blue dots are electrons travelling to the nearest finger and then along the busbar to the ribbon and probe bar. You choose the grid, the light and the temperature; the page computes the full current-voltage curve.

Diode model. The cell is a current source (the photocurrent Iph, proportional to the light that gets through the grid) in parallel with a diode and a leakage (shunt) resistance Rsh, all behind a series resistance Rs: I = Iph − I0(e(V+IRs)/nVt − 1) − (V+IRs)/Rsh. The implicit equation is solved exactly with the Lambert W function. The maximum power point is found by golden-section search; fill factor FF = Pmp/(IscVoc) and efficiency η = Pmp/(G A).

The metal grid. Fingers shade the cell (shaded fraction = N w / L plus the busbars) but they also shorten the path of the current. Between two fingers a distance S apart the emitter carries the current sideways and wastes Rsheet S²/12 (Ω cm², integrating (Jx)²Rsheet from the finger to the mid-point). Along a finger of length ℓ the current grows linearly toward the busbar, which wastes ρ S ℓ²/(3 w h). More fingers: less emitter loss, more shading, so the efficiency has a maximum, which the page finds numerically.

Temperature. The cell temperature follows the NOCT rule Tc = Tair + (NOCT − 20) G / 800. The saturation current grows as T³exp(−Eg/nkT), so the open-circuit voltage falls by about 2 mV per kelvin while the photocurrent rises by 0.05 % per kelvin: a hot cell makes less power.

Honest simplifications. One diode with ideality factor 1 and a constant series resistance (real cells have a second diode, voltage-dependent recombination and lumped contact effects); the emitter and finger losses use the uniform-current-density approximation at the maximum power point, and the busbar and the ribbon resistance are left out; the photocurrent density at one sun (41 mA/cm² before shading) and the other material numbers are typical textbook values for an aluminium back-surface-field silicon cell, not a particular product; the fingers are drawn wider than their true 45 µm so they can be seen, and the electron paths are a sketch, not a drift-diffusion calculation. Educational physics for trends, not a cell design tool.

Checks. (1) The Lambert-W current equals a bracketed Newton solution of the diode equation and the open-circuit voltage equals nVt ln(Iph/I0+1); (2) the ideal fill factor equals the closed-form FF0 expression; (3) the numerical temperature coefficient of Voc equals the analytic one; (4) the finger and emitter resistances equal direct numerical integrations of the dissipated power; (5) the optimum number of fingers equals a brute-force sweep, and the areas of the wafer, busbar and finger integrated from the Blender GLB triangles equal the nominal dimensions.

Loading model...
Loading Blender model...
Current and power against voltage
Efficiency against the number of fingers
Where the sunlight energy is lost