This is a genuine two-dimensional hydration field across the Nafion membrane: one axis is thickness (anode ⊖ → cathode ⊕, where protons hop by the Grotthuss mechanism), the other is position along the gas flow channel (inlet → outlet). The 3D version of this sim only resolves the thickness axis; here both directions carry real, independently-computed physics.
∂λ/∂t = D_w(λ,T)·(∂²λ/∂x² + ∂²λ/∂y²) − v_drag(λ,i)·∂λ/∂x
D_w(λ,T) = D₀(λ)·exp[2416·(1/303 − 1/T)] (Motupally et al.)
σ(λ,T) = (0.005139λ − 0.00326)·exp[1268·(1/303 − 1/T)] S/cm
a_cathode(y) = RH + 0.6·i·(y/L_channel) product water accumulates downstream
Through-plane (x): electro-osmotic drag drags water anode→cathode with every proton (only in x — current flows straight through the membrane, not along it), opposed by back-diffusion down the concentration gradient. In-plane (y): water also diffuses along the channel direction, and the cathode's local equilibrium hydration rises from inlet to outlet as oxygen-reduction product water accumulates in the gas stream — a real, well-documented along-channel non-uniformity that a 1-D through-plane model cannot show at all.
- Current density i — more drag pulling water toward the cathode, and faster product-water buildup along the channel.
- Temperature — both diffusivity and conductivity follow Arrhenius terms.
- Inlet RH — sets the equilibrium hydration the humidified anode boundary is clamped to at the channel inlet.
- Anode feed toggle — Dry + high current is the classic failure mode, and it hits hardest near the channel inlet: the cathode there hasn't yet built up product water, so there is less back-diffusion to rescue the anode side. Watch the top-left corner of the map dry out first.
The heatmap shows λ(x,y) directly; bright dots are protons hopping anode→cathode at whatever channel position they were seeded, moving at a rate set by the local conductivity they're crossing through.