Each node is a university department wired into a collaboration network (shared staff, joint projects, cross-listed courses). A digital-transformation initiative — a new LMS, a shared data platform, an AI-assisted advising tool — does not spread department-to-department at random. It follows a Watts threshold cascade: a department only adopts once enough of its own neighbours already have.
Department i adopts when:
(1 / k_i) · Σ_{j ∈ N(i)} x_j ≥ θ_i
k_i = number of neighbouring departments
x_j = 1 if neighbour j has adopted, else 0
θ_i = department i's resistance threshold
This is complex contagion, not simple diffusion (like a Bass S-curve): one convinced colleague rarely flips a department chair, but three or four independently doing so usually does. The same threshold rule explains why some campus-wide rollouts stall at a minority of early-adopter units while others tip almost overnight once a critical mass of connected departments crosses the line.
- Adoption threshold θ — the average fraction of already-adopted neighbours a department needs before it converts too. Lower θ = a more change-ready institution.
- Seed champions — how many departments the transformation office starts with (pilot units, IT, a dean's office).
- Network density — average number of cross-department links; sparser networks fragment into cascades that never reach every corner, denser ones let pressure build faster.
- Advance one semester — runs one synchronous update: every department recomputes its adopted-neighbour fraction and converts if it clears θ.
Real-world relevance: this threshold-cascade model (Granovetter 1978, Watts 2002) is the standard tool institutional-research offices and EdTech consultancies use to forecast how long a university-wide digital rollout will take, and to find which departments to seed first to avoid a stalled cascade.