Ecologists rarely judge an apiary's footprint from a single number. They set up a ring of monitoring plots around the hives, track a biodiversity index at each one over time, and ask two questions: is the landscape stable (do readings stay steady, or swing wildly), and does colony pressure correlate with changes in the surrounding flora and native pollinators? This scene turns that fieldwork into a live 3D dashboard.
Real apiary impact studies often use paired-plot designs and multi-year time series precisely because a single snapshot can't separate a genuinely unstable ecosystem from ordinary season-to-season noise.
A ring of monitoring plots surrounds a 3D apiary, each column tracking a live biodiversity index while colour-coded correlation beams show how colony density, pesticide load and floral diversity pull the surrounding ecosystem toward stability or stress.
Plot height jitter is tied to an overall stability index, and beam colour/thickness encodes the correlation between colony density and each plot's biodiversity — the same logic ecologists use to separate real impact from ordinary seasonal noise.
Adjust colony density, pesticide load and floral diversity to see the correlation web and stability ring respond. Toggle the web on or off, switch seasons, or resample plots for a fresh landscape layout.
Ecologists distinguish a genuinely declining ecosystem from a noisy but stable one by tracking variance over multiple seasons, not by reading a single year's snapshot.