Bayesian hyperparameter optimization treats the (unknown) mapping from hyperparameters — here, learning rate and regularization strength — to validation accuracy as a random function. A surrogate model (a Gaussian-process-style estimator) maintains a predictive distribution over that function everywhere in the search space. Information theory gives a principled way to decide where to evaluate next: pick the point whose outcome would most reduce our uncertainty about where the true optimum lies.
Methods like Entropy Search, Predictive Entropy Search and Max-value Entropy Search formalize exactly this idea: instead of just chasing the best-seen value (exploitation) or the most uncertain point (pure exploration), they query wherever an observation is expected to shrink the entropy of the optimizer's belief about the optimum the most — often finding good hyperparameters in far fewer trials than grid or random search.
A purple-toned 3D entropy surface over a two-dimensional hyperparameter search space (learning rate × regularization), where height and color show how uncertain and information-rich each untested configuration is to an information-theoretic Bayesian optimizer.
Each click evaluates a hidden validation-accuracy landscape at a hyperparameter pair and updates a kernel-smoothed surrogate's predictive entropy H(x) everywhere. Switching to the information-gain field shows the entropy-search-style acquisition score that trades exploration against exploitation.
Click anywhere on the surface to run a trial there. Adjust the kernel lengthscale and observation noise to see how fast uncertainty collapses, toggle between entropy and information-gain coloring, and use "Suggest next trial" to auto-pick the highest-information point.
Entropy Search and Max-value Entropy Search choose hyperparameter trials by maximizing expected reduction in the entropy of the optimizer's belief about where the true optimum lies — often beating plain expected-improvement search in trial efficiency.